Answer to the question raised about the right of Imamate on the recitation of the book of Hanafi in Fiqh 9633262622

The ibarat of Tahtabi Ala Marakil Falah and the ibarat of Mukhtar of Addurru are very close. Therefore, the answer to the question raised on Ad Durrul Mukhtar and Raddul Muhtar will be the answer to the question raised on Marakil Falah. What is actually in Addurrul Mukhtar and his commentary Raddul Muhtar? Who will be more entitled to the creator of Ad Durrul Mukhtar Imamati? In discussing this, he repeatedly mentioned that,

1. The person who knows more about the masala of prayer will be more qualified for Imamate. If everyone present is equally knowledgeable about the month of prayer, then-
2. The one whose Kirat is beautiful among those present will be the Imam. If everyone agrees, then-
3. The person will be the Imam, who survives more than the old and the suspicious object. If everyone is equal in this too, then-
4. The person who is older than all or who has accepted Islam before will be the Imam. If all present are equal in this quality, then-
5. Whose character is good. Even so, owning one is still beyond the reach of the average person.
6. The person who performs more Tahajjud will be the Imam. If everyone is equally endowed with this quality, then-
7. The person who is the best in terms of lineage will be the Imam. If everyone agrees, then-
8. The person who will be more aristocratic will be the Imam. If everyone agrees, then-
9. The one whose voice is more beautiful will be more entitled to be Imam. All are equal, all specified by the tahale a ثم الأحسن زوجة ثم الأكثر مالا, ثم الأكثر جاها (ثم الأنظف ثوبا) ثم الأكبر رأسا والأصغر عضو raddula the explanation has been muhatare (قوله ثم الأحسن زوجة) لأنه غالبا يكون أحب لها وَعَفَّ لِعَدَمِ تَعَلُّقِهِ بِغَيْرِهَا. "Then the person will be the person who is beautiful", whose wife is beautiful "because in this case, there will be more love with other women, so He will be safer than doing. And this matter (whose wife is beautiful) can be known from the companions or neighbors or relatives. This does not mean that everyone present will start talking about the qualities of his wife, so that his wife is known to be beautiful. (قوله ثم الأكثر مالا) إذ بكثرته مع ما تقدم من الأوصاف يحصل له القناعة والعفة فيرغب الناس فيه أكثر "in which the asset is" more resourceful talent in the foregoing, it is natural to him than the little tustata and Akhlaq cleanliness. And people are (naturally) more interested in such a person. (قوله ثم الأكبر رأسا إلخ) لأنه يدل على كبر العقل يعني مع مناسبة الأعضاء له, وإلا فلو فحش الرأس كبرا والأعضاء صغرا كان دلالة على اختلال تركيب مزاجه المستلزم لعدم اعتدال عقله ا ه ح. وَفِي حَاشِيَةِ أَبِي السُّعُودِ وقد نقام ما لا يليق أن يذكر وكأنه يشير إلى ما قيل أن المراد بالعضو الذكر بالعضو الذكر "Then whose head is small and small", it is proved that the person's owner is more. That is, as soon as the rest of the limbs are in harmony. Otherwise, if the head is abnormally large, and the rest of the limbs are small, then this is evidence of a problem with the anatomy of the person, which requires a lack of balance of his intellect. And it is in the commentary of Abu Saeed. It is not appropriate to mention that he has narrated such a thing from some people. Stay away from writing. It is written there that they seem to have indicated here that the purpose here by the organ is gender. Ask readers! Mentioned above is the original Ibarat of Ad Durrul Mukhtar's commentary Raddul Muhtar and his translation. Those who have been given the slightest brains by Allah on their heads, can they say what is said in the two books like guilt? Who says that the smaller the penis, the more entitled the Imamate? Allama Haskafi, the creator of Addurrul Mukhtar? Or Allama Ibn Abedin Shami, the creator of Raddul Mukhtar? Neither of them said so. On the contrary, Allama Shami, the author of Raddul Muhtar, in his commentary on Abu Saud, has clearly stated that the purpose of the organ is to take the gender vaguely, and that it is wrong and improper. How can he say that what he has said is wrong? Deen propaganda in the name of such lies? Acting on the Qur'an and Sahih Hadith? Those who do not have such wisdom, will they understand the Qur'an and Sahih Hadith again? What does organ mean? Addurrul Mukhtar said, whose limb will be small. What is an organ? We know that there are 360 ​​organs in the body. We do not understand why the so-called Ahlul-Hadeeth are taking the meaning of the word 'limb' in the book by excluding 359 limbs. Even if the sex is intended by the organ, it will not do any harm. Because then the purpose is to protect one's private parts from the foreign woman. That is to say, committing adultery and fornication, looking at other women and having fun, keeps one's self-esteem small so that the person is undoubtedly worthy of the northern character. If this person possesses the above mentioned qualities as well as the above mentioned qualities, then the more deserving of that Imamate is the one who deserves praise. What happened to the criticism? Critics take note of their own pot and write on page 98 of Maulvi Wahiduzjan Sahib Nuzulul Abrar, a great scholar of Ghair Muqallid or so-called Ahl-e-Hadith, discussing the right of Imamate - then whose wife is more beautiful. Then the more wealthy person, then the more dignified, then the more deserving of the Imamate who wears more clean clothes. Then the one whose head is big and legs are small is more entitled to Imamate. (Nuzulul Abrar-98) In Nuzulul Abrar, small feet have been mentioned in clear words, and in Addurrul Mukhtar, it has been said that limbs are a little more common. The legs of Nuzulul Abrar and the limbs of Addurrul Mukhtar are the same thing. But it is a pity that the Muqallid brothers in Gair understand the limb to mean only the special limb. May Allah protect the nation from the propaganda of the liars who deny fiqh. 1494998449