sirat and history Fatwa Cover

Criticizing the Companions and calling Yazid a Kafir 6737716238

Islami Jindegisirat and history


Question

The Imam of a mosque said in the context of criticizing the Companions, criticizing the Companions and practicing their faults is completely najaiz and haram. He further said that Yazid cannot be called a kaafir. Rather, he can be called a transgressor, a tyrant and a heretic. A man from the assembly said, "Yazid must be a disbeliever." If you do not call him a disbeliever, then the prayer cannot be offered behind you. There is some controversy over this issue. In fact, Yazid can be called a kafir or not? Or can the Companions be criticized? 8163419565


Answer

- حامداومصلياومسلما، بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم -

Ra of the Companions. It is a great sin to harbor hatred and practice their faults and it is against the Islamic creed. By this faith is damaged. Allah Himself is the Ra of all the Companions. Gave the good news of being in heaven and the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) strictly forbade them to criticize. Even the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said that only those who have enmity towards me in their hearts can blame my Companions. Needless to say, the Companions are not Ma'sum. Even if one or the other of them has done something wrong, they immediately repent and cleanse themselves from sin. They have made such a great sacrifice for the religion that no one else has been able to do. It will not be possible till the Day of Resurrection. For this reason, it is haraam for the ummah to criticize their mistakes. Talking about them well is part of faith. The Companions are not true, but they are the standard of forgiveness. It is narrated in the book Akikadatu Tahabi that it is Deen-Iman and Ihsan to love the Companions. To hate them is kufr, hypocrisy and transgression (Aqeedat Tahabi 140). The above discussion proved to be like daylight - it is forbidden to criticize and criticize the Companions. And what Imam Sahib has said about Yazid is correct. That is, Yazid can be called a transgressor and a tyrant. Kafir cannot be called. Because, reviewing his life and deeds, it is proved that Yazid was a transgressor or a tyrant, not an infidel. Moreover, none of the Ahl al-Haqq called him a kaafir. Calling someone a kafir without proof is kufr. 7177771457

- والله اعلم باالصواب -

* This Fatwa was translated by Google Translate.
To see the original click here