Response to the propaganda about Ashraf Ali Thanbi made by Rasulullah Ki Noor 3256385351

The person claiming to have made the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) Noor has made some demands in the above statement. E.g.

1. Hazrat Ashraf Ali Thanbi has confirmed this hadith.
2. This hadith is described as acceptable in Musannaf Abdur Razzak.
3. Imam Bayhaqi has narrated this hadith in Dalailunnbuya, Abdul Haq in Muhaddith Dehlabi Madarijun Nawawat, Ibn Hazar Makki in Afzazul Quran and Ibn Hazar Askalani in their books.
4. Eminent Imams have acknowledged the authenticity of the hadith. These four claims have been made by the person claiming to be the Messenger of Allah. We have added two words to the statement of Ashraf Ali Thanbi (may Allah be pleased with him) with his brother's statement and the words of the book of the rest of the muhaddithin as "acceptable". Which the brother claiming Nur did not mention to keep the fog.The reason we add these two words is that the fact that something is written in someone's book does not prove that the statement is acceptable to the author. And what is not acceptable to the author is nothing but immoral and deceptive.The author's statement is the word that can be run, which is the author's own statement. If the hadith in question is quoted in the books mentioned as such, then it alone will not be documentable. Unless it is found to be accepted and accepted by the compilers of the above texts.Since Nur's claimant brother is claiming with reference to the books of the above personalities, he is claiming that the hadith is acceptable. Therefore, it is becoming clear that the compilers of these books have accepted the hadith as acceptable. But Nur's claimant brother did not write this in clear language. Just to cheat.But by quoting his own claims and references, he proved that the compilers of those books said that the hadith of Noor was acceptable. Four claims were made by deceptive claims and lack of evidence, but sadly, no evidence was presented in support of one claim. Then the demand remained just a demand. Where is the authentic hall?The claim of Nur's claimant brother will be fulfilled by presenting a few issues. E.g.
5. Ashraf Ali Thanbi (may Allah be pleased with him): By mentioning in clear language how and in what words and in what discussion the hadith has been brought in his book. At the same time, Ashraf Ali Thanbi has commented that the hadith is acceptable or not? That too must be mentioned. Only then will the truth of the man's claim be proved.
6. In which chapter of Musannaf Abdur Razzak, in which chapter, on which page, how many hadiths have been brought in that hadith? Did Abdur Razzak, the author of the hadith, recognize it as saheeh or acceptable? Without adding both these statements, the claim of the claimant is being answered, but it is not being proved to be any proof.
7. Imam Bayhaqi, Abdul Haq Dehlabi, Ibn Hazar Makki, Ibn Hazar Askalani have quoted this hadith in which chapter, in which chapter, on how many pages? Did they recognize the hadith as acceptable? Without the answers to these two questions, it would be deceptive and deceptive to deny the acceptance of the hadith to the person mentioned, but Noor's claim will not be proved to be true at all.
8. Which eminent Imams have accepted this hadith as acceptable? What are their names? Which book mentions these recognitions?It would be deceptive and deceptive to say that the muhaddithin have accepted the hadith without clarifying the matter, but the document cannot be anything. Only a person with a little conscience knows that if you claim to have a statement in a book, you have to quote the name, page and exact statement of the book. Then the statement of the compiler of the book has to be mentioned about that statement.But Nur's claimant brother did none of this. Just wrote a few fictional names. He did not mention on which page of the book, in any discussion, in what words it was quoted. So this is nothing but deception.At the same time, everyone knows that bringing a statement into a text does not mean acknowledging that statement is correct and acceptable. Rather, many times to prove the statement wrong, or even if the compiler forgot to bring it in his own text. So first we have to see whether the author has recognized the statement as correct and acceptable. But even in this case, Noor's claimant brother could not show any statement on behalf of the compilers, so that the compilers, after bringing the hadith in their book, recognized it as acceptable.On the contrary, many hadith scholars have clearly stated that the hadith is false and fabricated. The statements of some of the Imams of Jarah Tadil are quoted below. The Imams who have given the opinion that the hadith is false are Al-Mugir Alal Ahadisil Mawuate Fir Jamiis Sagir-4, At Talikatul Hafela Alal Ajbibatil Fayela-129, Al-Busiri Madehur Rasoolil Azam-65, Majmu'at Fatwa Ibn Taymiyyah-3 Tahqiqatun wa Anjarun fil Quran Was Sunnah-151-156Al-Asarul Marfua-43 Two questions to the claimants of light Question No. 1 If the claimant of light does not hold the brother correct, then the question is, is the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) not made of light but is endowed with Sifati Noor i.e. revelation, guidance etc.If it is said that the nation of Allah is made of light, then what is the difference between Allah and His Messenger? Allaah is becoming the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). So what is the difference between the Christian's belief in the birth of Jesus and the belief in the creation of the Prophet with the light of God's nation?Why aren't these people infidels like the Christians because they call Jesus a part of God and call him a disbeliever? And if the purpose of guidance, revelation, etc. is taken by light, then there is no question. We all believe that Rasulullah SAW Noor. That is the light of guidance. Illuminated by the light of revelation. The light of truth. But if Nur is to be made of Nur, what else can it be but an idiot? The Qur'an is not made of light but of light, just as guidance is made of light but not of light. Similarly, the Prophet (peace be upon him) is light but not made of light. Question 2: What is the point of accepting this hadith as saheeh? The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was created with the light of Allaah. And all creation with the light of the Prophet, right? So all the insects, animals, youth, jinn, angels, earth, sky, paradise, hell, planets and stars are all made with the light of the Prophet? If the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was created with the light of Allaah, if all the insects, young plants, people, jinn, angels, animals were created with the light of Allaah, then everything is not made of light?Then why only the Prophet (peace be upon him) is said to be made of light? Isn't everything made of light in proportion to the demands of the claimants of light?Kafir mushrik, Jannati, Jahannami, cows, goats, buffaloes and all animals and insects to call the light of the Prophet, the name of the Prophet Ashek or Gustakhe Rasul?In the name of honoring the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), with the light of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), cows, goats, insects, infidels, mushriks, all rubbish, how can one be a lover of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) We do not know whether any heresy has such a heinous creed. But these so-called hopes are used by the Prophets to make the Prophet (peace be upon him) a beacon of light.May Allah protect the Muslim Ummah from the lies and deceptions of these rude and so-called lovers. Amen. If you want to know the detailed answer in this regard, read: 1 Tahaqiq of the hadith found in the light of light and the absurd statements of the claimants of light 2 Is the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) made of light? 4 Is the Prophet (peace be upon him) made of the light of God? 5 Tahqiq of the Hadith about the Light of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the first creation প্রথম Does verse 15 of Surah Maidah prove the creation of the Prophet's Light? আলী Ashraf Ali Thanbi's response to false accusations about Noor. 8364653633