The similarity of secularism and irreligion 3973111191

Although attempts have been made to differentiate between the two from a linguistic and lexical point of view, the main character and real motives of the secularists and their continued activities are irreligion and anti-Islam, it is not clear to any conscious person today. The so-called secular Islamophobes do not seem to want to keep quiet about this. If not, then why are they today born in the house of Muslims দাব claiming to be Muslims, bearded true Muslims and calling scholars fundamentalists and fatwas? And েরাthey themselves are active in observing all kinds of anti-Islamic subcultures including Hindu culture like lighting the Mars lamp? Taslima Nasreen demanded the amendment of the Quran. At the same time, he wanted to remove the borders of Bangladesh. At that time secularists did not even use the word two. There was no protest. And the government has kept him with a license. Just what? In this situation, when the people of Haqqani Ulama, led by Kiram, called for a strike to protest against all these blasphemous words and messages, the claimants of secularism called on the people to resist the strike. The idea is that Taslima did not commit a crime by insulting the Qur'an. On the contrary, those who have called a strike to protest the desecration of the Qur'an have committed a crime by saying that they are defending the Qur'an. So they called for a counter-strike against the defenders of the Qur'an to make their secularism even more striking. Doesn't this prove that secularism is the root cause of secularism? In the false name of the spirit of the war of liberation, those secularists rallied in support of all anti-Islamic and anti-Islamic activities on Eid. Their situation escalated to the point that those who spoke in favor of Islam, spoke in favor of the Qur'an, provided accurate information against NGOs, India, London and the United States in defense of the country's independence, and exposed their conspiracies, were anti-independence. By calling him an enemy of the country, a fatwa-bearer, a fundamentalist, an obstacle to development activities, etc., he started spreading confusion in the society about Islam, Muslims and scholars. So the real truth is that their so-called secularism is just an external label of irreligion. So there is no difference between secularism and irreligion of those anti-Islamists. There is a proverb- “What is your name? The resulting identity. 8838976364