
What is the method of going to Gasta in Tabligh Jamaat and what is the document of Hadith for 3 days, 40 days and 120 days? 1981945342
Ahle Haq Bangla Media Service•preaching•
Question
Answer
- حامداومصلياومسلما، بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم -
Introduction Nowadays most of the people in our society do not know the difference between Alem and Ghaire Alem. The funny thing is that after reading a book of Hadith and translation of Quran in Bengali or English, many people are now pretending to be Allama. The common people of our society are making the man a great Allama only if he can memorize the translation references of some books and give them one after the other. Does the man have the ability to understand Arabic? Is it possible to extract masala from the original book without translation? Does Shane Nuzul have complete knowledge of Quranic verses, word ornaments, Arabic grammar, Nasekh-Mansukh, Shane Urud, Tafsir etc.? Etc. The society that learns to give the status of Allama to the translators without verification. Why would the people of that society go to the scholars? Due to not going to the scholars. The main reason for the confusion in our society is that we do not feel the need to approach those who narrate the Qur'an and Sunnah from the original book, its Nasekh-Mansukh, Shane Urud and Shane Nuzul, Tafsir etc. The tendency of Allama Sajar to read some translations by himself has increased lately. If you do not understand the translation of a book, or if a question arises, find a solution on your own. If not, the book is wrong to start preaching. Full of shirk. Is that the case at all? Many new generations of this society are going astray as they do not feel the need to know it from any wise scholar. Even if no one thinks it is safe to treat a sick person without going to a wise doctor, While it would be prudent to start construction on one's own without going to an engineer for the construction of a multi-storey building, the people of today's society seem to have the audacity to learn everything on their own without resorting to wise people on sensitive issues like Quran and Sunnah. And the abyss of misguidance is sinking. If any question arises about a book, it is necessary to ask the scholars for the answer. If you can't find a solution on your own, spreading slander is a sign of stupidity. What could be more foolish than presenting evidence on the basis of one's own ignorance? That is the nature of the allegations leveled against the Deoband and Haqqani ulama in Fayyil, Amal and Akbar. Some very learned people read books on their own without the supervision of a wise person. Then the question arises. Find the solution on your own. This book is wrong without getting an answer. Full of shirk. If a reader reads a medical book on his own and the question arises somewhere and the reader finds the book wrong without finding the answer on his own, then such a matter is extremely ridiculous to the wise doctors. Similarly, the translation of this very scholarly Qur'an and Sunnah makes the wise scholars laugh when they see the type of complaint of the readers. The same is true of the question raised by Fayyil Amal. The way the question is asked, it seems that the questioner is a great scholar of Hadith. Great wise man about Quran and Sunnah. Notice below that the questions have been asked if there is any ignorance about Quran and Sunnah. Answer to the question: This question is a foolish question. These questions are indicative of ignorance about the method and principles of propagating the religion. The shout of preaching, three days, one year. If the specific method of Gast etc. is bidat. Then why the academic system of madrasa is not bidat? Why one book after another is taught in madrasas in the classical way? Did the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) teach religion in this way? Giving a certificate after completing the studies of Islamic University, Arabic University, Jamia will also be considered as a bidat. Because the Prophet (peace be upon him) did not teach Quran and Hadith in such a manner. Would it be wise to call them bidat? Or to ask such a question will be the pattern of the final stage idiot? Tabligh Jamaat is not the name of a new party or organization, but the duty of preaching has been carried out more or less collectively and separately in every age since the death of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the Prophet (peace be upon him). Hazrat Ilyas (RA) has only tried to revive it in a massive and organized manner. Just as every organization has its own agenda and agenda, so too it has developed some agenda for this congregation, primarily for the benefit of the common man. With the full Shari'ah in mind, he laid down a set of principles, thinking that it would be easier to adhere to the full Shari'a if one of these issues could be brought to the fore first. This includes 8 times, 3 days, one shout, three shouts, gasat, etc. Which is in no way outside the bounds of Sharia. At the same time, the Shariah does not deny any command. For example, the current madrasa education is not a new addition to the Shari'a, but the first madrasa was the congregation of the Companions who were always engaged in the practice of religion. However, there is a systematic difference between the present Madrasa system and the Ashab-e-Suffar Madrasa. There is no difference in originality. There was no syllabus at that time. There was no classical infrastructure. There was no method of giving certificate. There was no principle of statutory teaching staff. But later an academic method was discovered for the benefit of mangoes and to gain more benefits in the practice of religion. All the ulama agree that this discovery is not a bidat. Similarly, setting some basic principles as the current organizational basis of Tabligh Jamaat is not a new issue, nor is it a bidat. Because we do not consider the present system of madrasa education as a work of thawab, but we know the practice of ilmi deen as a work of thawab. Similarly, the method of Tabligh Jamaat is not the cause of thawab, but the work that is done by it, that is, tabligh is the work of thawab. There is no difference between the two. Therefore, to declare Tabligh Jamaat as a new addition to the Deen is a sign of ignorance about the definition of Bidat and the final stage of ignorance about Deen. Because it is called bid'at on the authority of Ayesha (may Allah be pleased with her). She said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: If a person discovers something new in our religion that is not in it, then it is abandoned. (Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadith No. 4806, Sahih Bukhari, Hadith No. 2550, Sahih Muslim - 4569) Notice in this hadith the conditions under which the newly discovered object is abandoned by the Prophet. 1-Completely new subject. The slightest proof of which must have been something which did not exist in the age of the Prophet or the age of the Companions. 2- Must be a religious subject. So no matter how many new things are discovered except religious matters, it is not bidat. Such scientific discoveries. New new furniture etc. These are not innovations. Because these are not religious issues. Rather material matters. 3-There must be new discoveries in the midst of religion. If it is for religion then there is no problem. Because the new discovery in the religion means that it is the work of thawab. Sunnat, wajib etc. And for the sake of religion, it is not the work of thawab, but the work of thawab is helpful. For example, the academic system of madrasa education did not exist in the Nawabi era. Was later discovered. This academic method is not a new discovery in religion, but has been discovered as a helper for religious work. That is, religion is helpful for learning. And the flame of religion is the work of thawab. But the system is not really the work of Swab, but helpful. Similarly, the current method of preaching has been discovered by Elias Rah as a helper in propagating the religion. That is the discovery for religion. Religion is not a discovery. So there is no chance of it being bidat. Those who say that this method is bidat, they are basically showing the ultimate ignorance about religion. Since the work of Tabligh Jamaat is preached by the Prophet (peace be upon him) and his later companions, it is only an integrated form of preaching the religion. Therefore, the work of Tabligh Jamaat will include those virtues which are the virtues of preaching the religion mentioned in Quran and Sunnah. Madrasa students who study in the current academic system will get the benefit of such religious education. 7995471617
- والله اعلم باالصواب -
* This Fatwa was translated by Google Translate.
To see the original click here
Related Fatwas
- Tablighi brothers do not say the verses of the Qur'an and Hadith, only the rabbis said in the statement! The elders said! Why say that 5896617136
- Tabligh Jamaat is a new innovation in Islam 7737443513
- Is there any legal basis for the shouting of Tabligh Jamaat? 4585763712
- Whoever recites the Kalima Tayyiba 100 times a day, on the Day of Resurrection his face will be as bright as the full moon. ”Is this the word of Hadith? 3946244268
- Is there any legal basis for keeping Bibi daughters at home and staying on Tablighi tour for a long time? 7485762511
- What are the sunnats of Eid day 6977938274
- Let us see what is the rule for forty days (shouts) or four months (three shouts) to call Muslim brothers to Islam in different parts of the world. 5227283544
- What is the ruling on fasting on the day of Eid-ul-Adha? 9867477855