
Whether the Qur'an can be touched without ablution 6323241869
Ahle Haq Bangla Media Service•permissible•
Question
The so-called Ahl al-Hadith brothers say that the Qur'an can be taken without aju. Their arguments are - - - A brother said to him, What is the meaning of La Yamachchuhu Illal Mutahharoon? He replied, "In fact, your interpretation of the verse does not correspond to the previous context of the verse." Such a meaning can be given to this sentence by separating it from the previous subject matter. But judging by the context in which the word is spoken, there is no chance to say, "Let no one but the holy ones touch this book." Because, the disbelievers are addressed here. They are being told that this is a Book sent down by Allah, the Lord of the Worlds. Your notion that the devil taught the prophet is completely wrong. No one can touch this book without holiness. The strong point is that the verse was not sent down to give this instruction. But the style of the sentence indicates that in the same way that only holy beings can touch this book in the court of Allah, at least those people should refrain from touching this book while they are unclean. Those who believe that this book is the word of God. He did not say anything about fasting without ajute! Of course, it is better to stay with azur all day, but you cannot say that it is obligatory or obligatory to stay with azur all the time. Obligation has not made ablution obligatory for many purposes, such as fasting or paying zakat, even in some parts of Hajj, even if ablution is not obligatory. And to touch the Qur'an or to perform one azur in oil. That is better (Nurun Ala Nur). But if you add to Islam what the Prophet did not say, then you must have created bidat. Why should you be harsh on what God has relaxed, like the Jewish Christians who were not forced to do much but imposed it on themselves (such as monasticism). In verse 7 of Surah Mayda, Allah Almighty says to perform ablution to perform salat. But you have to perform ablution in the Qur'an. Can you show which verse it says? It is permissible for anyone to recite the Qur'an and touch it with his hands, whether one is without ablution or in an impure state or a menstruating woman. Ibn Hazm in his book Al-Muhalla (Vol. 1, pp. 6-84) would like to ask another question: Was the Qur'an revealed only for the Muslims and not for the whole human race? If they believe for the whole human race, then non-Muslims perform ablution millions of times, but will they still be holy? So how do non-Muslims get the light of the Qur'an? And if it was said to the people that no one can touch except the saints, then whoever touches them will become holy, it means they will become paradise !!! I hope you will benefit from the answer. Many also preach this. Can't touch Quran without aju? Most of the time people do not have aju. And if the Qur'an cannot be touched without ablution, then most of the time one should refrain from reading the Qur'an. And it is the work of the devil to refrain from reading the Qur'an. Those who say that the Qur'an cannot be read without ablution are quoting verse 69 of Surah Waqbiyyah. The verse is as follows: لاَ يَمَسُّهُ إلاَّ الْمُطَهَّرُوْنَ. The key words of the verse are three. For example, mas (مَسٌّ) = to touch / to come close to, to perceive, hu (هُ) = ঐ and mutahharun (مُطَهَّرُوْنَ) = holy. Leaving the original three words unchanged, the simple meaning of the verse stands: "No one can touch that Qur'an except Mutahharun (the Holy One)." Looking at the previous two verses, it means, "Surely this is a glorious Qur'an, which is in a secure secret book, and no one can touch it except those who are holy." (56: 6-79) The Qur'an spoken of here is not the Qur'an of the world, it is the Qur'an of Laohe Mahfuz. And holy means the angels. Because, 1. When these verses were revealed, the whole Qur'an was not revealed. Therefore, the Qur'an of the world cannot be the protected book mentioned in these verses. 2. "(هُ) = ঐ" means the distant preserved Qur'an. And the distant preserved Qur'an is the Qur'an of Laohe Mahfuz. 3. There is no mention of "do not touch". Mentioned "can't touch". Anyone can touch the Quran of the world. Therefore, it is not the Qur'an of the world but the Qur'an preserved in Laohe Mahfuz. The word ‘mutahharun’ in this verse means ‘innocent angel’ according to Ibn Katheer and Ashraf Ali Thanbi, a large number of Companions according to Mufti Shafi, according to Tabi’i it will be ‘innocent’, Maududi also translated it as ‘innocent’. So it is not a matter of touching or reading the Qur'an. For those who believe, I am also quoting two man-made hadiths below: Narrated from Ibn 'Abbas. Once the Prophet (peace be upon him) came out of the toilet and food was presented to him. Then the people said, "Shall we not bring you azur water?" He said, "I have been ordered to perform ablution only when I am preparing for the prayers." (Tirmidhi, Abu Dawood, Nasai) It is narrated from Ali (RA) that the Prophet (SAW) used to come out of the toilet and recite Qur'an to us without any ablution and eat meat with us. He could not be prevented from reciting the Qur'an or anything other than janabat (bathing obligation). ” (Abu Dawood, Nasha'i and Ibn Majah) The real meaning of the above verse stands (56:79) No one can comprehend it except those who are sincere. * Those who are not satisfied with sincerity only in the Qur'an they are prevented from understanding the Qur'an divinely. This idea is repeated in the Qur'an (17: 45-48, 17:56). As a result, they do not understand this verse. Match the translations of 6: 3, 18: 48, 41: 44, and 58:69. So the excuse of azur does not mean staying away from the Qur'an. Oblige to reply to the mentioned statement quickly. 6974855236
Answer
- حامداومصلياومسلما، بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم -
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) rightly said in the hadeeth: فأفتوا बिना علم فضلوا وأضلوا) Narrated by Hazrat Abdullah bin Amr bin As. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: Allaah will not take knowledge out of the hearts of His slaves; Rather, he will pick up the knowledge by picking up the scholars. In the end, when there is no scholar left in the world, people will accept idiots as leaders. Then they will be asked masala masail, and they will give fatwa without education. In this way they will deceive themselves and will confuse others. (Sahih Ibn Hibban, Hadith No. 4561, Bukhari Sharif, Hadith No. 100, Sahih Muslim Sharif, Hadith No. 6961, Musnadush Shihab, Hadith No. 571, Al Mu'jamul Awsat, Hadith No. 55, Sunan No. 52, Sunan Tirmidhi, Hadith No. 2652, Sunan Daremi, Hadith No. 239, Sunan Nasai Kubra, Hadith No. 5908, Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 5711, Musnadul Bajjar, Hadith No. 2 No. 26, Muzammil Ibn Asakir, Hadith No. 162) That time has come. The rhetoric of the ignorant person about the Qur'anic Hadith in that question is emerging as a clear goal of this Hadith. He has tried to distort a clear semantic verse of the Qur'an by capitalizing on his own imaginary ideas. He has tried to cultivate his immature knowledge without any document on this sensitive matter. Take a good look at the image of ignorance and stupidity of the fertile brain of the so-called researcher - may Allah protect the nation from the hands of these seditionist, very learned and ignorant people. Crazy delirium: "He did not say anything about fasting without aju!" The researcher said, "He did not say anything about fasting without aju!" The image of ignorance of his research became clear. One must hold the sacred object. Another is to refrain from certain activities. Even a person of ordinary intellect will understand that two objects will not have the same order. If the object to be caught is pure, if it is held with unclean and unclean hands, the object may become unclean. So the object should be caught cleanly. This is normal. Anyone is able to understand that. If you want to refrain from anything else, since the object is not being touched, then the question of cleanliness is irrelevant. The Quran is a holy book. So it cannot be caught with unclean hands. And fasting is the name of abstaining from eating and drinking and sexual intercourse with intention. Therefore, the command to touch the Qur'an can be confused with the command to abstain only from the final stage. No conscientious person can reconcile the two. Ignorance about Arabic grammar The Qur'an is the holy word of Allah Almighty. This holy word is not permissible for any impure person. This provision is for Muslims. For example, the rules of prayer, fasting, Hajj, Zakat, etc. are for Muslims. Infidels may not observe this provision. But there is no chance for Muslims to violate this provision. Similarly, if you want to touch the Qur'an, you have to be pure. It is not permissible for a Muslim to touch the Qur'an in an impure state. If he claims to be a Muslim and thinks like a non-Muslim, then it is different for him. In this regard, Allah, the Lord of the worlds, has instructed in the Holy Qur'an: দৃষ্টিِنَّهُ لَقُرْآنٌ كَرِيمٌ (6:77) فِي كِتَابٍ مَّكْنُونٍ (6:8) Surely this is a glorious Qur'an, which is in a secret book. In the grammar of Mujar, that is, using the present and future semantic verbs, he says that no one is and will not touch it except those who are pure. No. Where is the future semantic word and where is the past tense word "can't". That's what the ginger merchant took the news of the ship. The complete Qur'an has not been revealed. Therefore, the Qur'an of the world cannot be the protected book mentioned in these verses. If he had known this Arabic grammatical style, he would have understood that the imperfect Qur'an which has been revealed now and the Qur'an which has been revealed in full in the future, is instructed by Allah that it cannot be touched in an impure state. Not understanding the difference between the words "can't" and "can't", the bizarre researcher said that those who touch this Qur'an will become holy and paradise !! Alas researcher! Alas, scholar! Ignorance of the Qur'anic style The so-called researcher, if he had the slightest connection with the Qur'anic narrative style, would not be foolish to say that "(هُ) = ঐ" means the distant preserved Qur'an. If this is the case, then in the beginning of the Qur'an, in Surah Al-Baqarah, Allah has used a distant word, saying: (Surat al-Baqara, 2) What does the use of the word distant in this verse mean that there is no doubt only in the Qur'an preserved in that distant iron. And there is doubt in the Qur'an on the ground (Nawzubillah)? Or do we say that even though the word remote is used here, both the Qur'an of the heavens and the earth have been declared free from doubt? Surely this is what we explain. And the definite explanation is that even if the word distant is used, the Qur'an here is the purpose of both the heavens and the earth. If the bizarre researcher brother had ever had the grace to look at this verse of Surah Baqara, he would not have had to wear it in such a fog. The subject matter of ignorance about the hadith, the traditions eseche عن عبد الله بن أبي بكر بن حزم أن في الكتاب الذي كتبه رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لعمرو بن حزم أن لا يمس القرآن إلا طاهر Abdullah bin Abu Bakr ibn Hazm, the Prophet peace be upon him, said: 'Amr ibn Hazm's He wrote a letter to the effect that no one would touch the Qur'an unless it was sanctified. " (Muwatta Malik, Hadith No. 60, Kanzul Ummal, Hadith No. 2630, Marefatus Sunan Wal Asar, Hadith No. 209, Al Muzamul Kabir, Hadith No. 13217, Al Mujamus Sagir, Hadith No. 112 - 465, Sunan Daremi, Hadith No. 228) On the authority of Abdullah bin Umar, the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: Narrated by Al-Tabrani in Al-Kabeer, Al-Saghir and Al-Jazalah. Narrated from Hazrat Abdullah bin Omar. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: No one will touch the Qur'aan except a holy person. (Majmauz Yawaid, Hadith No. 1512) Allama Hafez Nuruddin bin Abu Bakr Haysami said: Imam Tabarani has narrated it in both Kabir and Sagir. And all its narrators are Sikba cum acceptable. Ignorance of the wise people about the Qur'an, Hadith and the Islamic Shari'ah is like the Imams of the four schools of thought recognized by all right-wing Muslims, the Qur'an cannot be touched without the Holy. Ibn 'Abd al-Barr said in the remembrance (8/10): In the Qur'an, it is not permissible to touch the Kareem without sanctifying it. Imam Ali (may God bless him and grant him peace) said: It is forbidden to touch the Qur'an without being pure No opinion contrary to this opinion has been narrated from the Companions. (Sharhul Muhajjab-2/60) Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: Hazrat Salman Farsi, Hazrat Abdullah bin Omar and others voted in favor of the prohibition. None of the Companions narrated the opposite. (Majmool Fatawa-21/26) Ignorance of the incident of Hazrat Omar (RA). And no one can hold this book except the Holy One. (Musnadul Bajjar-1/401, Mustadrake Hakeem-4/7, Sunan Dara Kutni-1/121, Tabaqatul Kubra Liibne Saad-3/26, Sunanul Kubra Lilbayhaqi-1/6) Ignorance of logic is a natural argument that No one can hold the Qur'an in the sky except a holy person. That Qur'an cannot be grasped without a holy person after it has come to earth. That's normal. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah said in Sharh al-Amadah (p. 384): And whether it be in the air or in the cell or in the quilt, if this is the ruling of the Book which is in the heavens, it is not to be touched except the purified ones, and if the Book which is on the earth is like that; The sanctity of the book is not the same as the name of the Qur'an. مَرْفُوعَةٍ مُطَهَّرَةٍ) (Abbas: 13-14). The Qur'an that we have is the Qur'an which is in the safe of iron. Like the Qur'an, whatever is in the middle of the Qur'an, whether it be leaves, or leather, or stone, or wrapper. Therefore, since the command of the written book in the heavens is not touched by anyone except the Holy One, the same provision is required in the case of the Qur'an on earth. Because, the honor of this (Quran on earth) is the same as that (Quran in heaven). Or the purpose by the book in the verse is isme jeans. Whatever the Qur'an means, whether it be in heaven or on earth. (Sharhul Umdah-364) At the same time, the word of Allah is indicating that the Messenger of Allah is the Messenger of Allah, that is, the Messenger of Allah; Who recites the Holy Sahifa. (Surat al-Bayyinah-2) Elsewhere it has been mentioned in the Holy Book, (Abasa-13-14) Respected and respected among the so-called Ahl-e-Hadith, Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz (may Allah be pleased with him) said: (http://www.binbaz.org.sa/mat/130) Researcher brother is a believer? He dismissed this suspicion by calling the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) a "man-made hadith". No believing Muslim can comment on the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) unless it is man-made. And if it is a forgery, then why is that hadith presented as evidence? If the two hadiths are not forged, then it is not a man-made hadith to be ridiculed for destroying faith? And if the two hadiths are false, then what is the point of presenting them as evidence? Anyway. I took this comment as a whim of the bizarre researcher's bizarre brain. What we are looking at, what is the topic in question? And what is the document? The question is, can the Qur'an be touched in an impure state? But unfortunately, nowhere in the two hadiths presented by the so-called researcher is it mentioned. In the first hadith, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said about food, that he is not destined to perform ablution without prayer. And in the second hadith it is said that the Prophet (peace be upon him) used to recite the Qur'an without ablution. Where is the touch of the Qur'an in these two hadiths? There is no need to read the Qur'an so much. The Qur'an would have been revealed to him. And he would memorize it to the Companions. There is no need for him to read the pages of the Qur'an. Since he does not need to hold the Qur'an. So what is the need to be accustomed to aju? And in the second hadith it is said to teach the Qur'an. There is nothing to touch. We also say that it is permissible to read in the Qur'an without Kareem Aju. Just catching is not permissible. So how is that hadith a document against our opinion? I am praying to Allah to give a little wisdom to the researcher. On the other hand, there is another verse which indicates that if one shows respect to the things named after Allah, it is due to the fear of Allah in his heart. Isn't this a sign of fear of Allah? May Allah protect the nation from the misleading research of such bizarre researchers. Amen. Shumma Amen. 8289326937
- والله اعلم باالصواب -
* This Fatwa was translated by Google Translate.
To see the original click here
Source
- Surah: ওয়াক্বিয়া, Verse: 77
- Surah: ওয়াক্বিয়া, Verse: 78
Related Fatwas
- Touching the Quran Sharif app on the phone without aju 6864647621
- Touching the Qur'an with the mouth or lips when the ablution is broken 9217824554
- Touching the cover of the Qur'an without aju 6174791298
- Can the Qur'an be read without ablution? 6611955883
- Can the verses of Quran Kareem on mobile and computer screen be caught without aju? 5589126741
- A documentary analysis of whether the Qur'an can be recited during menstruation 2614739349
- Touching Quran Majeed with ghilaf during menstruation 1299959768
- What is the ruling on reciting the Qur'an without ablution? 3882742741