Response to the Falsehood on the Hadith of Hazrat Umm Kulsum R. 4328467599
Ahle Haq Bangla Media Service•preaching•
Question
An allegation was spread on the net in the context of an incident of Fazail Amal- “While describing the virtues of Salat, Mr. Shaykhul Hadith Sahib wrote-“ Abdur Rahman, the husband of Hazrat Umm Kulchum was ill. At one point he fell into a coma and was pronounced dead by everyone. Umm Kulsum hurriedly stood up for prayer. As soon as he finished the prayer, Abdur Rahman gained knowledge. He asked, "Did my condition resemble death?" People said, yes. He said, "I saw two angels come and say, 'Let your decision be in the court of Allah.' Saying this, they were about to take me away. Meanwhile a third angel came and interrupted them and said, "Go away. This is a man who has been declared lucky in the womb." His children will have the opportunity to receive grace from him for a few more days. Then he was alive for another month. " Maybe someone from her area told the story of Umm Kulsum and her husband. And in order to write such a story, just as it is not necessary to mention the name of his reference book, so it is not considered necessary to write (Razi.) Or (Rah.) At the end of their name. If the daughter of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and her husband were the couple in the narration, then it was necessary to write (Razi.) At the end of their name. The mistake that can easily get your claim denied is to fail. However, it is not our intention to mention these errors. Our aim is to draw attention to what is flawed and misleading in the light of Qur'an and Hadith. Muhtaram wanted to explain through this incident that not only human beings are wrong but also the angels and Allah Himself is not above the error (Naujubillah). Then another angel came and interrupted him and saved him from death for a month. Doesn't the incident prove that the first two angels came by mistake? So did it happen without the knowledge of Allah? Or did Allah first send a mistake and then correct it with another angel? And where was Malakul Mut (‘A.) then or then? If Shaikh Sahib was alive, what would he answer these questions? Doesn't such a mistake come to the notice of the scholars who have spent the year of Tablighi Jamaat? If they fall, why aren't they correcting? Or do they also agree with Shaykhul Hadith that the angels and Allah are not above error (mayaj Allah, this is the erroneous aqeedah of the Shia school) they can also make mistakes? May Allah forgive us. Allah Subhanahu wa Ta'ala is above all mistakes. Even angels cannot be wrong. True Muslims hold this aqeedah. Allah created the angels in such a way that they never disobeyed Him. Do not act as you please. That power was not given to them. From generation to generation they are engaged in the work for which they have been created. They are each skilled and expert in their respective fields. Allah Almighty has given them the ability to complete every task perfectly. So there is absolutely no possibility of mistakes or faults in their work. They only do what Allah commands them to do. In this regard, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): Surah Tahrim . One might think that Allah has extended the life span of her husband by one month for the benefit of wife (Umm Kulsum) prayer. If one holds such an absurd belief, then it would be an extreme aqeedah error and inevitably kufr. Through one's worship and supplication, Allah removes one's danger, but does not increase one's life. Because Allah causes all living beings to die within His pre-determined time. In this regard, Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): (Surat al-A'raf: 34) Allah, the Exalted, further says: Tell me, does the statement of the author of Nisab contradict these verses of the Qur'an in Tablighi? There are references to Mansur in the distance (page 18 (above) or 63 (below)). I am expecting an answer from you in this regard. 8319665666
Answer
- حامداومصلياومسلما، بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم -
Due to the opposition of Maqbool Dal Tabligh Jamaat to Allah Almighty, Allah has snatched the blessings of pure intellect from their minds. Otherwise, the man would not have shown such sarcasm and arrogance only towards Fazail Amal. The anti-Amal brother in Fazail has raised a number of allegations in his writings. E.g.
- If Umm Kulsum and her husband Hazrat Abdur Rahman have been the daughter and son-in-law of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) respectively, then why did Shaykh Zakaria not write “Raziallahu Anhu”?
- There is no mention of any source in this story.
- By this incident it is understood that Allah and the angels are wrong, Naujubillah.
- Allah cannot increase the blessings of life with the blessings of prayer. So the phenomenon is absurd. Answer to Complaint No. 1 We have the period of publication of Darul Kitab. This incident has been quoted in the first chapter of Fayyil Amal, pages 15 and 16 of this publication and on pages 63 and 64 of the original Fayyil. In plain language the original Urdu and in Bengali after the name of Hazrat Umm Kulsum is written "(Razi)". Then, after the name of Hazrat Abdur Rahman, it was written in clear language, "(Razi)", then "R" was not written, so these two great Companions were not treated insultingly? Didn't lie with that? Deen propaganda in the name of such lies? Fayyal Amal's anti-Amal brother has complained that the answer to the second allegation has not been mentioned. In fact, the source has not been mentioned, nor has the word "Durre Mansoor" written after the incident was recorded due to dimming of the eyes due to hatred, has Allah kept it out of his sight? Anger over the incident or Fazail Amal? If the researcher brother's main purpose is to question the incident. Criticizing the incident, then he should have first criticized the world famous Tafsir book "Tafsir Durre Mansoor" written by Allama Jalaluddin Suyuti Rah. Where the incident is mentioned. The question of morality will first be on the far Mansur before the question is raised on the Fayyil period due to imitation from the far Mansur. Criticism will first be on Mansoor in the distance. Why did Jalaluddin Suyuti bring the incident in his Tafsir? Didn't he have the same knowledge as the so-called research brother? Did he not know that this incident proved that Allah and the angels were wrong? (Naujubillah) He did not know, Kufri Aqeedah is proved by this incident? Isn't the authenticity of the description of Mansur far? What could be more fraudulent and deceptive than to accuse Fazail Amal of merely forging without discussing the matter? Instead of blaming the original book, I left it to the readers to decide how big of a scam it is to complain about the translation. Waz has kept a logical discussion, this incident proves that Allah Ta'ala and the angels were wrong. The person who believes in the error of Allah is definitely a disbeliever. Which Muslim can disagree with this? Certainly not. But what was to be discussed? And what did he discuss on his own behalf? Evidence of a near event from the book of Ahl al-Hadith Nawab Imam Siddiq Hasan Khan of Ahl al-Hadith, in his book "Ad Dau Wad Dawa" has given the title - "Baraat Minan Nar". After giving this title, Ahl-e-Hadith Nawab Siddiq Hasan Khan Sahib has narrated the incident: Malakul sees Maut in this condition. He said, "Shall I write to you about the deliverance of hell?" The man said yes. Then he wrote it on a piece of paper - Astagfirullah! Astagfirullah! Said, this is the liberation of hell. Then the sick person was healed by it. The man had the paper. The man was alive for many days. " (Baraat Minan Nar, entitled "Ad Dawood Wad Dawah" written by Imam Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan of Ahlul Hadith) One might ask, the book is not of Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan. For them, I have written a book in the lifetime of Siddique Hasan Khan, son of Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan, whose name is "Masare Siddiqui". At the end of that book is given an index of the book written by Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan. The name of the book number 29 in that index is "Ad Dau Wad Dawah". Readers notice! The incident of Fayyil period has been copied from the famous Tafsir book Durre Mansur. He did not write the fabrication on his own behalf. But the incident written by Muqallid Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan in Ghair directly mentions the angel of Malakul Maut. Even though his death was imminent, he did not die due to reciting dua. Siddique Hasan Khan did not mention any of these sources. In that case, the alleged researcher brother's allegations do not apply? Have any of your Ahlul Hadith scholars from Pakistan and India ever complained about this incident of Nawab Sahib? Do you have any writings or lectures? If not, then why is there so much resentment towards Fazail Amal even after quoting Jalaluddin Suyuti's famous commentary book "Durre Mansoor"? Response to the 3rd and 4th allegations. There is no basis for this. This was not mentioned anywhere in the incident. Rather, Allah has blessed the life of that person with the blessing of prayer. Allaah has instructed in the Holy Qur'aan, just as the servant seeks help from Allaah through prayer. Irshad is: وَاسْتَعِينُوا بِالصبرِ وَالصَّلَاة Seek help from Allah through patience and prayer. (Sura -45) described the incident durare manasure sutrasaha وأخرج عبد الرزاق في المصنف والبيهقي من طريق معمر عن الزهري عن حميد ابن عبد الرحمن بن عوف عن أمه أم كلثوم بنت عقبة وكانت من المهاجرات الأول في قوله (واستعينوا بالصبر والصلاة) قالت: غشي على الرحمن بن عبد الرحمن غشية فظنوا أنه افاض نفسه فيها فخرجت امرأته أم كلثوم إلى المسجد تستعين بما أمرت به من الصبر والصلاة فلما أفاق قال: أغشي علي آنفا قالوا: نعم قال: صدقتم إنه جاءني ملكان فقالا لي: انطلق نحاكمك إلى العزيز الأمين فقال ملك آخر : Return, if this believer has written for him happiness and in his belly, he will be able to listen to him, God willing. There is also Jame Mamar bin Rashed, Hadith No. 2006. Almatalebul Alia, Hadith No. 396. The comment of the muhaddithin about the hadith
- Allama Busiri said: The authenticity of the hadith is authentic. (Ithaful Khairatil Mahrah-6/222).
- Allama Sakhabi said: The hadith is proven. (Al-Ayyibatil Marjiyah) Such an authentic and authentic narration has been misunderstood by the ignorant researcher Sahib using various words. By keeping Mansoor away from the original book, Fayyil wants to spread the net of deception and fraud by making baseless allegations against Amal. May Allah protect the Muslim Ummah from such ignorant scholars. Make the work of da'wah and preaching common all over the world. Amen. Chumma Amin. 2875569135
- والله اعلم باالصواب -
* This Fatwa was translated by Google Translate.
To see the original click here
Related Fatwas
- Tahkeek of the hadith found in the light of light and the nonsense of the claimants of light 7124991651
- Answers to some of the most common questions about madhhabs 5697116394
- “Allah Ta'ala and His angels, all the creatures of the heavens and the earth, even the ants in their holes and in the water, pray for mercy on those who teach good words to the people. 7113952961
- Bukhari's account of the Prophet's attempted suicide 2857131816
- Is there no evidence for the four rak'at prayers of Kabbalah Jumu'ah? 3126297162
- Say the words of Iqamat not once but twice 3375526392
- Did not the meraj of the Prophet (peace be upon him) happen in a dream while awake in his body? 6511332519
- What is the proof of the fact that the reward of a person who goes to the mosque only to teach or teach about welfare is like that of a pilgrim whose Hajj has been completed / accepted? 8263471939