In Fiqh, there is no chain of Hanafis up to Imam Abu Hanifah, so it is not acceptable. 3214914131

Wow! Well argued. This is why we say that the first condition of being an atheist is to be a muqallid in the world. No muqallid can be an atheist. Your question is completely off mark. Masha Allah good question. But I am afraid, after two days, you will sit asking like atheists that Allah Ta'ala wrote his Kalam with his own hands? By which we can understand that the words that are spoken in his name are spoken by him? How can I believe that Allah has said or not? If there is any doubt about any verse. (As the atheists doubt about various verses.) Can you give any assurance that you will not do it after a few days? If you are an atheist, what answer do you have? I hope you never ask such a question. God forgive me! Every verse of the Qur'an is not authenticated from the Prophet (peace be upon him). Therefore, the verses of the Qur'an are not the words of Allah? The book of Fiqh Hanafi attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa is not authenticated until Imam Abu Hanifa, so Hanafi Fiqh is not of Imam Abu Hanifa? One answer to the two questions is that the Qur'an was not written by Allah. But the word of God. Although there is no authority for every verse of the Qur'an until the Prophet (PBUH). But it is the word of God. The evidence is that the word of Allah, the Qur'an, has reached us through Mutawati, that is, in an uninterrupted succession. All those who have conveyed it bear witness that it is the word of Allah. Because of this tawatur we believe it is the word of Allah. No proof is required for this. In the same way, the issues of his Madhhab attributed to Imam Hanifah have reached us through various books on Mutawati sources. Those who believe in Hanafi fiqh, they also say, Hedaya, Kuduri, Kanyud Dakayek, Sharhe Bekaya are Hanafi in fiqh, and those who do not believe also say that these fiqh are Hanafi. It is mutawatir. So no certificate is required for this also. Because when a matter reaches the door of Tawatur, its evidence is not required. Being Mutawatur is a great evidence. That's why Allama Ibn Hajar Asqalani rah Sharhu Nukhbatil wrote in the fiqar: والمتواتر لا يُبْحتُ عن رجالهبل جبم الامعل به من غير بحث i.e. in the matter of Mutawati, Rabi's will not be discussed. Rather, it is necessary to act on it without discussion and review. (Sharhu Nukhbatil Fikar-42) I hope you understand that your question is a question of ignorance. 7912731783