Musafaha how many hands with one hand or two hands 1434965929

The beginning of Musafah with one hand When two Muslims meet each other, they greet each other, which was a sign of mutual love. After Salam, Musafaha also does. And among the Muslims, the method of musafah with both hands was recognized as a continuous tradition. No Islamic text before the British rule has commented that performing musafah with both hands is a violation of bidat and sunnat. This wonderful environment started during the British rule. Musafaha in the hands of the Muslims when they meet each other. And when the English meet each other, Musafaha with one hand. The modern scholars were the first to adopt this custom of the English. College started the practice of traveling with one hand in varsity. Of course, they thought it was the English method. But later, by imitating those modern scholars, the so-called Ahl al-Hadith also came up with the custom of reciting Musafah only with the right hand. But the difference is that the so-called Ahl al-Hadith, by declaring the method of the English as Sunnah, started propagating among the Muslims that the practice of Musafahar Amli is a bidat and a caliphate of Sunnah. The English also kept busy promising to be martyred in order to keep the system alive. At the same time, the followers of the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) began to propagate the Jamaat as anti-Sunnah, destroyers of the Sunnah. The abolition of the Islamic system, which is prevalent among the Muslims, is called the revival of the Sunnah. In this way, Salam and Musafaha, which until today were the means of mutual love and forgiveness of Muslims, became the means of strife and division. At that time there was no Islamic caliphate that would thwart this terrible conspiracy of division among the Muslims. Rather it was English rule. Whose policy was - "dispute and rule". That is why they were in favor of the government. The Ahl al-Hadith group continues to flourish with the help of government opportunities. Documents of Musafah with one hand The Ahl as-Sunnah wal Jamaat asked them, "Do you have any Qawli Hadith of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) for your statement that it is Sunnah to make Musafah with the right hand and Sunnat against the left hand?" So that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said that just as it is commanded to eat only with the right hand, so it is commanded to eat only with the right hand. Just as it is forbidden to touch the right hand while performing istinja, is it also forbidden to touch the left hand while performing musafah? If there is any such hadith, submit it from Bukhari Muslim. If not, submit it from Sunan Arbaa. If it is not found in Sunan Arbaat, then submit it from other hadith books. If this ruling is not proved by saheeh hadeeth, then present the hadeeth of Hasan level after confessing that "you do not have saheeh sareeh hadeeth of Musafah with only the right hand". If Hasan Hadith is not available, then prove this ruling by a weak Hadith. But the so-called Ahl al-Hadith have so far failed to present such a hadith, and will continue to do so until the Day of Resurrection, God willing. When the so-called Ahl al-Hadith fail to prove the narration of Musafah only with the right hand by Qawli Hadith, they were asked to present a Qawli Sahih Hadith from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) so that Rasulullah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) Musafah with his right hand and kept his left hand apart. If Sahih is not found, then Hasan Hadith, if Hasan Hadith is not found, then present weak Hadith. But they were also unable to do so. Even if you are unable. Finally, they were asked to present if they had a takbeer hadith. So that the Companions would recite Musafah in front of the Prophet (peace be upon him) only with their right hand, and the Prophet (peace be upon him) would be silent when he saw it. If its Sahih or Hasan Hadith is not found, then it is asked to be presented even if it is weak. But they also expressed inability to present it. Still incapable, insha'Allah will be incapable till the Day of Resurrection. The followers of Ahl as-Sunnah said to them: Where there is no hadith of Musafah only with the right hand, how is it called Sunnah? However, sometimes even if something is proved by Hadith, it is not Sunnah. For example, praying in a cloth, praying wearing shoes, praying with a child on one's shoulders is proved by the narration of Muttafaq Alai. But none of this is circumcision. Because, the condition to be done continuously for the proof of circumcision. Which was not found here. So there is no description in the hadith of just doing musafah with the right hand, where can one find it to be done continuously? So to call it sunnat is nothing but a lie. Document found !? Finally, when the Ahl as-Sunnah wal Jamaat repeatedly said that the practice which has been going on among the Muslims continuously is called bidat, why is the method of the English and the English educated being called the way of the Prophet (peace be upon him)? Hearing this, the cat came out of the bag. He said, “In some of the hadiths of Salam, there are words like اخذ باليد, اخذ بيده, that is, holding hands, etc. And the word يد is one word. By which it is understood that Musafaha should be done with one hand. The followers of Ahl as-Sunnah were surprised to hear their statement and their ignorance of Hadith. Because in the human body where one type of organ is more than one, the word of one word is used in every language because it is one type. As the saying goes, "I saw you standing there with my own eyes." Does any fool understand by this that the man is deaf so the word of one word has been used here? It is sometimes said, "I heard you with my own ears." Does that mean the man kept his other ear closed while listening? Moreover, one person says to another, "I will not put my foot there." Does this mean that the man has the same legs? Allah says in the Qur'an has karime ولا تجعل يدك مغلولة إلى عنقك ولا تبسطها كل البسط فتقعد ملوما محسورا (17:29 (krpanatabase) not to keep his hands tied to his neck, and (being wasteful) not to keep it fully open, you yaddaru condemnable and destitute (Surah Isra-29) Is the purpose of this verse only one hand? And that hand is the right hand ?! The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) himself used to pray, and he used to teach others that, “O Allaah! Give light to the eyes! Give light to my ears! (Sahih Muslim, Hadith No. 1835) So the purpose of this hadith is to mean one ear and one eye because the Siga of the word Basra and Sama is used? And the Muslim is the real Muslim from that language, that is the real Muslim. Whose hand is safe from the mouth of another Muslim (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith No. 10) and from the opinion of those who see a forbidden deed, that is, if a person sees a forbidden act, he should resist it with his hand, (Sahih Muslim, Hadith No. 16) Is there a purpose in the hadith يد with one hand? In this case also it is Sunnah to use the other hand Will it be a violation? In these hadiths, the purpose by يد is if the purpose is not with both hands for the sake of argument, but with the intention of one hand, then the word يد in Arabic means the whole part from the finger to the shoulder. Does this mean that if two people match the little finger, or the left shoulder of both of them, then this hadith will be followed? Won't it? Because the left hand is not the foot! Even if it is accepted that the purpose here is only one hand by يد, yet how can the continuous practice of the Ummah be called bidat and khilaf? Look! Performing prayers in one cloth from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is proven by saheeh hadeeth. But the uninterrupted practice of the Ummah is to pray in three garments. In the midst of this uninterrupted practice of the Ummah, the hadith of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) praying in one garment is also being practiced. As well as on other hadiths. To date, no one has commented on this uninterrupted period of the Ummah as Sunnat in Khilafah. In the same way, the continuous practice of musafah with both hands is going on among the Ummah, and the hadith of musafah with one hand is also being practiced. At the same time, the hadith of Musafaha with both hands is also being followed. So there is no fear of opposing any hadith of Ahl as-Sunnah wal Jamaat. For example, there is a hadith of washing one's limbs once in a while, there is a hadith of washing it twice, there is also a hadith of washing it three times. Now the person who washes his limbs three times, he has followed the three hadiths. On the other hand, a person who washes his limbs once has not done so on the basis of two hadiths. Now, if this person starts the propaganda that it is Sunnah to wash one's limbs once, and that it is Sunnah to wash it three times, then it is bid'ah and khilafah. No matter how much you regret it, it will hardly happen, right? In short, the so-called Ahl al-Hadith, contrary to the whole ummah, have taken one hand by yad only in their own opinion. Where by the whole ummah يد its jeans as well as the hands are intended with both hands. Not only this, with the help of his right hand he has taken the right hand. At the same time, he has not only denied the hadith of unity of Musafah with both hands with his own opinion, but has also established the Sunnah of Khilafah. When the matter of Musafaha with the right hand fails to be proved by any Qawli, Felli or Takbari, Hasan, Sahih or Zayef by any hadith, it has run towards the lexical meaning. It has been said that Musafaha is the name of the palm of the hand. But here also the hand has been used as his jeans and variety. So if two people do musafah with the left palm of their hand, then literally it is also called musafah, but they never act on it. Sorry! Neither the hadith has laid its hands on their heads, nor the lexical meaning has given them shelter. However, the compatibility of the disbelievers, which is forbidden by the hadith, has been achieved by them. Vision is also desired, choice is also desired! Musafaha with both hands Notice the continuous practice of the Ummah Musafaha with both hands, which they are propagating as bidat and sunnat in caliphate. Is it really unproven? Or is there evidence. Imam Bukhari has placed a chapter called "Babul Musafaha" on page 927 of volume 2 of his Sahih Bukhari. So he quotes from Abdullah bin Masood (may Allah be pleased with him) as saying: علمني النبى صلى الله عليه وسلم التشهد وكفى بين كفيه, meaning "The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) taught me Tashahhud, while my hand was between the two hands of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)." Imam Bukhari (may Allah be pleased with him) later established a Bab called "Babul Akhz Bill Yadain" or "Holding both hands". In it, the Musaffah of Hammad bin Zayd and Abdullah bin Mubarak mentions that they have done Musaffah with both hands. Then the above narration has been narrated from Abdullah bin Masood as a document of Musaffah of both hands with full proof that my hand was between the two hands of the Prophet (peace be upon him). (Sahih Bukhari-2/928, Hadith No. 5910, Sahih Muslim-1/173, Sunan Nasai-1/175) Used to. And this period continued even later. Imam al-Bukhari (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in his book on the date: I saw that Abdullah bin Mubarak came to him in Makkah Mukarramah, then he recited Musafah with both hands. (Sahih Bukhari-2/928 in the margin) It is to be noted here that both these personalities were the Imams of the Muhaddithin of their time. Imam Abdur Rahman Mahdi said that the Imam is four people, namely Malik, Sufyan Saori, Hammad bin Zayed and Ibn al-Mubarak. (Taykirat al-Huffaz) Other muhaddithin have also mentioned musafah in both hands. Hazrat Ayesha Siddiqah (may Allah be pleased with her) said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said to a woman: Hazrat Ayesha (may Allah be pleased with her) said that she made him swear allegiance only by words, not by holding hands. Allama Kashtallani: Irshadus Sari Sharhu Sahih Bukhari and Allama Badruddin Aini Rah: Umdatul Qari Sharhu Sahihil Bukhari in the interpretation of the statement of Ayesha R. said: This statement is also supported by the dream of Hazrat Shah Wali Ullah Muhaddes Dehlabi Rah. He said (in a dream) that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) smiled and extended both his hands towards me. As I approached, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) took my hand in the middle of Mubarak and recited it. (Ad Durarus Samin) Besides, Shah Wali Ullah wrote in Muhaddis Dehlabi Rah Al Qawlul Jameel that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) recited Musaffah with both hands with my father. Along with the muhaddithin, those who have been instructed in the Qur'an and Hadith to follow the fuqaha 'have also said that it is sunnat to perform musafah with both hands. That is why it is stated in the book called Majalisul Abrar that وَالسنة فيها ان تكون بكلتا اليدين Similarly, it is also found in Fatwa Shamite and Ashatul Lamaat. Moreover, it has been narrated in the hadith that when Muslims recite Musafah, his sins are forgiven. (Musnad Ahmad, Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah) It is clear that people sin with both hands. So sin should fall from both hands. But our Ahl al-Hadith friends seem to have reserved one hand for Hell, that there is no need for sin to fall from that hand. একবার এক আশ্চর্য মজার ঘটনা ঘটল। আমি এক গায়রে মুকাল্লিদ বন্ধুকে বুখারী শরীফের দুই হাতে মুসাফাহা করার হাদীস দেখালাম। তখন তিনি কিছুক্ষণ চুপ থেকে বললেন-“যদিও রাসূল সাঃ এর মুসাফাহার মাঝে দুই হাত ছিল, কিন্তু আব্দুল্লাহ বিন মাসউদ রাঃ এরতো এক হাতই ছিল। আর আমিতো নবী নই যে, উভয় হাতে মুসাফাহা করবো, তাই আমি এখানে নবীর বদলে হযরত আব্দুল্লাহ বিন মাসউদ রাঃ এর অনুসরণ করি”। আমি বললাম-”যেমন আপনি নবী নয়, তেমন ইবনে মাসউদ রাঃ এর মত সাহাবীও নয় যে, এক হাতে মুসাফাহা করবেন। তাই আপনি এক আঙ্গুলির সাথে অন্য আঙ্গুলি মিলিয়ে মুসাফাহা করবেন, যাতে আপনার নবী হওয়ারও কোন সন্দেহ না থাকে, আবার সাহাবী হওয়ারও কোন সন্দেহ না থাকে”। আমি তাকে আরো বললাম- কোন হাদীসে হযরত আব্দুল্লাহ বিন মাসউদ রাহঃ এর উভয় হাতে মুসাফাহা করেন নি, একথা আসেনি। আর তাছাড়া মন একথা মানতে পারে কি যে, রাসূল সাঃ উভয় হাত মুবারক বাড়িয়েছেন। আর ইবনে মাসউদ রাঃ কেবল এক হাত বাড়িয়েছেন? আসল কথা হল, যখন ব্যক্তি উভয় হাতে মুসাফাহা করে, তখন এক হাতের উভয় পাশে অন্যজনের উভয় হাত লেগে থাকে। হযরত আব্দুল্লাহ বিন মাসউদ রাঃ এক হাতের এ সৌভাগ্য বর্ণনা করেছেন যে, আমার এ হাতের উভয় পাশে রাসূল সাঃ এর হাত মুবারক লেগে ছিল। নিজের অপর হাত লাগোয়া ছিল না একথা বলেন নি। আল্লাহ রাব্বুল আলামীন সহীহ বুঝ দান করুন। সুন্নাতের উপর আমল করার তৌফিক দান করুন। আমীন। 8841418697