Are the Muslims who died in the war of independence in 1971 not martyrs? 8267485727

Your question has 3 points. Namely- 1- There is a question, and that is, those who gave their lives for the language and freedom of the country are martyrs or not? 2 There is an ignorance. That is, there was a war fought in seventy-one years to protect the border by the infidels. 3 We have a complaint against us. That is, we did not call those who died while protesting against injustice as martyrs in the previous post. Separate replies to three points are quoted, reply to No. 1 is the right of a person to speak his mother tongue. It is the right of every person to live in his own territory free from oppression. Those who seek to be unjustly deprived of that right. If those who are unjustly killed for protesting against them are Muslims, then that person is considered a martyr. If the person is not a Muslim, he cannot be called a martyr. Because Shahid is not a political term. It is a term containing a provision of Islamic Shari'ah. This applies only to Muslims. Not for Gentiles. If the Gentiles die like this in their religious books, what is said, why steal the terminology of Islamic law? Shaheed is a very dignified and significant word in Islamic view. This is Islam's own terminology. As soon as the martyr dies, he begins to enjoy the blessings of Paradise. Shahid is not a social or political term. So it is not advisable to use it everywhere. For Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, Atheists and Apostates, using this word is nothing but an audacity. There is no word other than martyr? The use of words related to a worship prescribed by Islam is therefore an insult to Islam. Calling martyrs especially those who are atheists, heretics or those who died for the purpose of serving their political lusts is nothing but a joke on this prestigious word of Islam. If the person dies in this way, what is said about the person according to the religious texts of the person who practices the religion should be said. Plagiarizing the religious terminology of others is never acceptable. عن سعيد بن زيد عن النبى -صلى الله عليه وسلم- said: « Whoever kills without wealth is a martyr. And whoever kills without his family or without his blood or without his religion is a martyr. Prophet Irshad said - "A person who is killed in defense of his property is a martyr. A person who is killed in defense of his family is also a martyr. Or if he is killed in defense of life or in defense of religion, he is also a martyr. (Abu Dawud in Sunan, Hadith no-4774, Ahmad in Musnad, Hadith no-1652) Those who are martyred in jihad in the path of Allah are called martyrs. This is the true martyrdom. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) called some people martyrs in terms of command. Not a real martyr but a person of status close to a martyr. As in the hadith- Narrated by Hazrat Jaber bin Atiq RA: The Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, said: “The martyrs are killed in the way of God. Prophet He said: There are seven types of martyrs besides dying in the way of Allah. 1- Martyr who died in epidemic. 2-Martyr drowned in water. 3- Martyr who died in bed. 4-Stomach Disease Dying Martyr. 5-The burning person is a martyr. 6-A person who falls under the debris and dies is also a martyr. 7- Women who died giving birth are also martyrs. (Muatta Malik, Hadith No-554, 802, Al Mu'zamul Kabir, Hadith No-1780, Sahih Kunuj Sunnatin Nababiyah, Hadith No-23) So the Muslims who died protecting their lives and families and their rightful rights are martyrs. Which is clearly understood in the light of the above hadith. The answer to No. 2 is that your idea is wrong. You may not have read the history of independence war well. He would not have said that the freedom fighters died just to protect the border. They died in defense of which border? At that time it was all Pakistan. So whose borders did they die to protect? Not really a border, but a deterrence policy of those in West Pakistan, their oppression, oppression, exploitation, murder, looting and raping of East Pakistan was the freedom struggle of 1971. Talking about border protection alone is not stupid. Since oppression, oppression has been fought against. Therefore, those Muslims who died fighting against oppression at that time will be included in the list of Hukmi martyrs who died to protect their wealth and their families. A person who dies for religion is called a real martyr. Which is the point. But even though he died protesting against wealth, family, and oppression, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) declared that person as a martyr. Therefore, the Muslims who died at that time will be considered as martyrs, inshallah. It would not be appropriate to call it a border war. The answer to No. 3 is actually the link you have given to our published post. Anyone who reads it will understand that your complaint is not correct. Because at the end of the post, it is clearly written - "However, if a Muslim makes a lawful protest in accordance with the state constitution, and he is killed unjustly, then that person can be called a martyr because of being oppressed and dying." This statement is clearly written at the end of the post in the above link. How do you say that we did not call those who died fighting against injustice as martyrs? This is a wrong accusation against us due to misunderstanding. or intentional slander. May Allah give us the right understanding. Grant me the grace to be a complete follower of the Islamic Shari'ah without transgressing the limits and without shrinking the limits. amen 1928682238