The attack of the Muslims on Khaybar was inhuman 8464969717

Atheists claim they are open-minded. Have a generous heart. Those who are open-minded should express everything freely. It is not a matter of free will to hide the basics and just mention the consequences. Rather the work of narrow-minded individuals. For example, one said, ‍ The freedom fighters of Bangladesh surrounded the members of Alshams forces. He took them out of their houses and killed them. They looted the goods kept by them. Now, if you look at the above statement outwardly, a conscientious person will say, hey, so much oppression! So unfair Why did the liberation forces kill a group of innocent people? Why besieged them and forced them to fight? Isn't that inhumane? We will reply that the person who made the first comment is a great deceiver and deceiver. He only portrayed the attacks and killings of Alshams forces. But for what reason were they killed? Why did the freedom fighters attack them? Without mentioning it, Mast has committed a great betrayal. If the man had mentioned at first that the Alshams forces had invited foreign enemies to kill the innocent people of the country, to plunder the houses. Has cooperated with external forces. They have even conspired more than once to assassinate the President of Bangladesh. The Mukti Bahini killed them as a punishment for their unforgivable crime. The person who will mention the whole thing in this way is the real free mind. And that person just mentioned the attack and the murder. But did not mention their crime. That person is not free-spirited. Rather, it is very sectarian and narrow-minded. If you understand the above example, you will understand the true nature of the above emotional statement of the atheist. The man has cheated and deceived somewhere. The atheist mentions the expedition of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to Khaybar. But he did not mention why the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) carried out this expedition, but resorted to extreme hateful deception. We do not know the real reality! Who are the residents of Khaibar? Those who lived in Khaybar. They were residents of Bani Nazir. Jewish. The Muslims had a peace treaty with Bani Nazir from the east. Once the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was sitting against the wall of a house in the slum of Bani Nazir. The people of Bani Nazir were using it very well externally. But on the ground floor a man decided to throw a large stone from the roof over the Prophet's head. As a result, he will become a martyr. Innalillah. This terrible news was conveyed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) by Allaah through revelation. So the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) got up and left. As a result, their conspiracy was foiled. Arabic text of the incident ورسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم إلى جنب جدار من بيوتهم قاعد, فمن رجل يعلو على هذا البيت فيلقي عليه صخرة فيريحنا منه, فانتدب لذلك عمرو بن جحاش بن كعب, أحدهم, فقال: أنا لذلك, فصعد ليلقي عليه صخرة كما قال, ورسول الله صلى God bless him and peace be upon one of his companions, they understand Abu Bakr, Amr and Ali, may God be pleased with them. Ibn Sa'd said, "Peace be upon you." رجع إلى خبر ابن إسحق قال: فأتى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم الخبر من السماء بما أراد القوم, فقام رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم راجعا إلى المدينة, فلما استلبث النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم أصحابه قاموا في طلبه, فلقوا رجلا من المدينة مقبلا فسألوه , فقال: رأيته داخلا إلى المدينة, فأقبل أصحاب النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم, حتى انتهوا إليه, فأخبر الخبر هم بما كانت أرادت يهود من الغدر به, (عيون الأثر, غزوة بنى النضير -2 / 70-71, دار القلم بيروت) Bani Nazir has done two heinous deeds. Namely- 1. Violated the agreement, II. Has made a heinous conspiracy to kill the Prophet. When Muslim forces arrived to punish them for their treachery, they took refuge in their fortress. The Muslims laid siege to their fort. They plotted another conspiracy while under siege. According to the news, three people should be sent to the fort on behalf of the Muslims. And three priests will be sent on behalf of Bani Nazir. If the three pastors become Muslims by discussing with each other. Then they will all become Muslims. But they also betrayed here and ordered the priests sent by them to hide the daggers. So that he can kill them just by meeting the Muslim ulama. (Sirat Mustafa, Idris Kandhalbikrit, 2/26) Even after such heinous betrayal was revealed, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not order them to be killed. Rather, it gave them the opportunity to move to a safer place away from Medina. Then they went to Khaybar and started their position. On their way to Khaibar, they also opened the door frame of their house. Their chiefs were Huai bin Akhtab and Kinana bin Rabi. (Uyunul Ashar-2/71) This is not the end of their conspiracy. Huai bin Akhtab, the chief of Bani Nazir, a resident of Khaibar, went to Makkah and besieged Madinah with a large force of ten thousand soldiers, inciting the Quraish and Qinana bin Rabi Bani Gatfan. (Fathul Bari-6/571, trench warfare) Not only that. Huai bin Akhtab, the Jewish chief of Khaybar, revolted and persuaded the Bani Quraiza, who had entered into a treaty with the Muslims from the east, to join the war against the Muslims. Howie precedent leaders of Israel, the chiefs kuraijara Banu Ka'b bin Asad bin Akhtab kurajike When it comes to drag his team, he said confidently Kab ويحك يا حيي: إنك امرؤ مشئوم, وإني قد عاهدت محمدا, فلست بناقض ما بيني وبينه, ولم أر منه إلا وفاء وَصِدْقًا Woe to you, O Huai! Surely you are a vile person. Surely I have a covenant with Muhammad (peace be upon him). So I can't break the agreement between him and me. And I found him a keeper of promise and truthful. (Sirat Ibn Hisham-2/220, Ghazwae Trench Chapter) Thus the Jews of Khaybar conspired one after another to destroy the Islamic State. These traitors even tried to assassinate the head of state of the Islamic State, Muhammad (peace be upon him). What is the opinion of the so-called free-minded people in the case of such heinous criminals? Is it a crime to punish them? Or is the severe punishment a fair trial? What does your free conscience say? Sapphire's husband was Kinana bin Rabi. That was a leader of Bani Nazir. This traitor incited the Bani Gatfan to wage war against the Muslims. Even then, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) made a peace treaty with them and ordered them to leave Khaybar and go to safety. But even here they were betraying and fleeing by stealing sacks containing a lot of booty. Which was led by Kinana bin Rabi. Not only that, he martyred the Companion Mahmud bin Maslama. He was killed because of all these unforgivable crimes. (Sirat Ibn Hisham-2 / 336-338) Forgive the perpetrators even after committing so many unforgivable crimes. Given a chance to go to a safe place twice. No such army hero, state victor has ever shown the history of the world. Can't even show. Can the so-called free-spirited people be tolerant of the above unforgivable guilt? In the case of the criminal razakars during the war of liberation, have the so-called free-minded people been able to follow that policy of the Prophet (peace be upon him)? Are they willing to give the Razakars a chance to move to a safer place? Or bias to bring them from abroad to judge? Has the apostate once asked his conscience that so-called free-minded? And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) married the helpless husband Safiyya with due dignity, and with the dignity of a wife, he gave her the utmost respect for this world and the Hereafter. Raziyallahu Anha. With a full position, no conscientious, rational, open-minded person can complain about the Prophet's Khaybar war. However, those whose brains have been deformed. Conscience-intellect is eaten by beetles. These ridiculous allegations are accepted by such insane atheists. 9458712285