Some questions about Dillur Rahman (Rajarbagi) and his answers 8678212393

We have received more such questions from different places about the person you asked about. However, since we are discussing the necessary and important issues in our question and answer section, the discussion about such ignorant people did not seem so important here. He is constantly saying many offensive things about our newspapers and the mouthpieces of big Qawmi madrasas and also about the Sahih religious papers and magazines. But we didn't even go to answer him thinking he was crazy. However, in order to save the common people from confusion, the answer to your question is given below: (A) The man himself has accepted the first of the explanations you have given in the name of Dillurur Rahman in a number of his published Bayyinat magazine. But the objection is - in Arabic, Dillun does not mean Eid, and if Persian is caught, then it will be Rahman. In that case ‍Dillun will not be valid. Moreover, it is not correct to say that Rahman's heart. Considering all these aspects, it is not permissible in the eyes of Shari'ah to have any name in this sense. In fact, there is no word dillun in Arabic to mean Eid. However, this order is based on his interpretation. You want to know- if the name is invalid, why doesn't he change it? How do we say this poison? This you can ask him or his courtiers directly. And the second part of his name, "misguided or misguided," seems to be the right thing to do. And for this reason, it is natural for his actions to be misleading. In this case, the similarity of his activities with his name can be found. (B) You want to know- what is his educational qualification? What we have learned from reliable sources is that the man is not a madrasa student at all. Intermediate pass in general line. He had read only two or four books of the early stages of madrasa privately from a Maulana. If you open any book of Tafsir or Fiqh in front of him to verify his educational qualifications, such as Bayazabi Sharif in Tafsir, Shami in Fatawa, etc., you will understand for yourself - the fleet of titles of his name is completely empty. (C) The extent to which his fatwa regarding the use of handkerchiefs is not permissible should be understood only by judging his educational qualifications. Enough knowledge and experience is required to give a fatwa. How do we say that a fatwa will be acceptable only if an extremely inexperienced, ignorant and inexperienced person gives a fatwa on religious matters? Feel free to use handkerchiefs mixed with white and red. There is no objection to this from the point of view of Shariah. The use of the color red by the Shari'ah for men, which is tanzihi in Makrooh, is meant to be pure red. In which there is no mixture of any other color. Since this handkerchief has a mixture of white color, it will be permissible to use it. There is a saying that little science is terrible, here that proverb has been implemented. The man may have heard from someone that in the Shari'ah it is makrooh for men to wear red. And based on that, Fatawa has killed. He did not have the opportunity to look into the explanation-analysis that is in it. Be that as it may, he does not have that qualification. The fact of the matter is that Islam today is utterly attacked by foreigners. Anti-Islamists are trying to harm Islam in various ways. Sometimes they hire the multi-faceted enemies of Islam at low prices and borrow work from them. And that is why he is using some people of Dillur Rahman type. Along with his name, Tajul Mufassirin, Muftiul Azam and Raisul Muhaddesin, at least 25/30 of them have used more titles. To use such a title voluntarily in one's own name is a kind of deception, arrogance and arrogance. There is a hadith in which a person who reveals something that is not in him is like wearing two garments of falsehood. [Bukhari and Muslim, Mishkat Sharif, 261] In order to clothe such hypocrisy with legitimacy, he promotes them as Sunnah. This is not the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Rather it is just a rule of satanic nature. If these are Sunnahs, then why didn't the Sahabah, the Tabi'is, the Muhaddiths and the Muftis, the unadulterated followers of the Prophet in the Sunnah, observe this Sunnah in Buurgan, which appeared in the ages. They did not use so many titles with their names. Among his titles, he pretends to be Raisul Muhaddisin. The easiest and most effective tool to punish such hypocrites is to open a book of Hadith in front of them and ask them to recite only Ibarat. খYou will see that the cat in their bag will come out in an instant. Medina, At-Tawheed, and Rashid, Moinul Islam, and other monthly magazines engaged in the important service of developing the true religion and tasteful literature and culture of the country. Bayenat seems to be the responsibility of the newspaper. 2924141232