Shaykh al-Albani's Arrogant Interference in Fake Hadith Rulings and Hadith Books 7294349945

The Principle of Islam About Fake Hadith Fake Hadith, which is called Mawzu in Arabic language and Muhaddisin terminology. Simply put, what is not a hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is called a hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him). Calling a hadith that is not proven by the Prophet (peace be upon him) a hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) is a fake hadith. In fact, all this should not be called Hadith. But since the narrators of these narrations have referred to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) as the hadeeth of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). This does not mean that these narrations are in fact hadith. Such as the word false prophet. In fact, the false prophet who claims is not the same prophet. Yet we say the false prophet Qadiani, Musailamaye Kazjab. Even in the case of fake hadiths, even though it is not a hadith, Keram has commented that it is a fake hadith. Ruling on Fake Hadith Since Fake Hadith is not Hadith. Therefore, it is not permissible, but haram, to propagate such a statement as a hadith of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) even after knowing it to be false and fabricated. However, it is permissible to narrate it as a false hadith. Such blasphemy is not permissible. But it is permissible to mention kufr to mean kufr. Promoting a fake hadith as the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) means lying in the name of the Prophet (peace be upon him). And there is a stern warning in the Hadith about lying in the name of the Prophet (peace be upon him). For example, Abi Hurairah, the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: Whoever deliberately lies to me, let him make his abode in Hell. (Musnadul Humaidi, Hadith No. 1200, Musnad Ibnul Jid, Hadith No. 1470, Musnad Daremi, Hadith No. 613, Sahih Muslim, Hadith No. 3) عن المغيرة رضي الله عنه, قال: سمعت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يقول: إن كذبا علي ليس ككذب على أحد, من كذب علي متعمدا, فليتبوأ مقعده من النار • Mughirah ra narrated from the Prophet. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: Lying to me is not like lying to anyone else. Whoever deliberately lies to me, let him make his abode in Hell. (Sahih Bukhari, Hadith No. 1291, 1229, Sahih Muslim, Hadith No. 4, Musnadul Bajjar, Hadith No. 126) In addition to the two hadiths mentioned, there are many other hadiths which say that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) used to lie about something. It is to be noted here that in every hadith the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) has uttered a warning in the case of a person who knowingly and intentionally spreads falsehoods towards the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). Therefore, it is understood that if a person unknowingly attributes a lie to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), then that person will not be subject to this warning and punishment. That is, the person will not be sinful due to ignorance. So if someone narrates a false hadith without knowing it, then he will not be a sinner. However, if even after knowing the forgery, the false narration attributed to the Prophet (peace be upon him) is propagated as the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him), then the person will be subject to the threat mentioned in the hadith. The man will be convicted of a very heinous and deadly sin. However, it would not be sinful to refer to a fake hadith as a forgery to make people understand or inform them. For example, it is not a sin to refer to the word kufr in order to prove kufr. If there is a fake hadith, should it be removed from the book? Everyone who has read the hadith in the Uloom knows that there is a great deal of disagreement among the muhaddithin as to which hadiths are forged or not. To some muhaddiths, a hadith is not a forgery, but a weak one. Again, the same hadith is false to another hadith. There are many such examples. For example, we returned from the smallest jihad to the greatest jihad, that is, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, “We returned from the small jihad to the big jihad. The statement of the muhaddithin about the hadith is-

1. Imam Bayhaqi said: The hadith is weak. (Kitabuj Juhad-2/185)
2. Allama Iraqi said that there is a weakness in the authenticity of this hadith. (Alaiha-2/7)
3. Mollah Ali Qari Rah: It is said that it has no basis, or it is fake. (Al-Asrar Marfuah-211)
4. Allama Jayalai said: The hadith is very rare (poor). (Takhrijul Kashshaf-2/395)
5. Allama Ibn Taymiyyah said: There is no basis for this. (Majmool Fatwa-11/198)Note here that Allama Iraqi and Imam Bayhaqi did not comment on the hadith as false. They say the hadith is weak. Allama Zaylai has commented that the hadith is poor. Didn't say fake. On the other hand, the rest of the muhaddithin mentioned above have commented that this hadith is false. So what is understood? The same hadith contains multiple comments from multiple muhaddiths. According to some, the hadith is fake. Again, the exact same hadith is not fake to another, weak or poor. And all the muhaddithin of Jamhur have given the opinion that the weak hadith is acceptable in the case of Fazail. If it is fake, then there is no disagreement that it should be discarded. Why did the later Muhaqqiqs not exclude those false narrations from the book of Hadith, despite the existence of false narrations? There could be many reasons for this. There are basically two reasons mentioned here-.
6. If there is a fake hadith in a book that is not practiced illegally, then it is unanimously fake? Or dissenting fake hadith? That's a big deal. If there is a contradictory fake hadith, how can you remove it from the compiler's book? The fact that the compiler has included the hadith in his book means that the hadith is not fake in its tahkeek proportions. Isn't it an unauthorized practice to exclude from the book of a compiler a book which, according to his tahaqiq, is not a forgery? On the contrary, the later Muhaqqiq may mention in the commentary of the said book that the hadith is false to most of the muhaddithin. So it is discarded. The latter can do just that. But removing it from the compiler's book will be nothing more than an unauthorized practice. You can write a book yourself without the fake hadith. But how will the next one get the right to exclude a dissenting fake hadith from a book written by another as a forgery according to his own verdict? For this reason, even after a hadith has been proven to be false by most of the muhaddithin, no later muhaddiths have left out the book of hadith. On the contrary, he has warned the readers about this in the commentary of the said book. He said that this hadith is false. By doing so, the responsibilities of the later Muhakkis have been fulfilled. No one did unnecessary unauthorized practice.
7. Protecting the Book from Degradation From the above discussion, I hope that it is understood that there are multiple opinions on the issue of forgery of Hadith. Some have resorted to austerity. Again no one has resorted to relaxation. Now, in the case of a book of hadith compiled by a compiler, it would have been permissible for anyone to come and dismantle the book at a later date. Then at some point the originality of the book will be lost. Because maybe someone who has a hard temper has tahakeek the book, he came and removed a lot of weak hadith from the book as fake. Another came and dismissed some more hadiths as he wished. So what is the stage in the book? Those who have a minimal knowledge of Islamic jurisprudence and fatwas know that even many ignorant people consider the hadiths of the opposite opinion to be rejected in order to prove their own views. If such a marginal ideologue starts omitting hadiths from previous books and starts printing them, then it will be seen that many hadiths from Bukhari Muslim have also started omitting them as contrary to their opinion. There is no other book that has found a weak hadith contrary to his opinion. In this way, if there is an opportunity to add and subtract the book, no further existence of the book of the original compiler can be found in the end.For this reason, in all the muhaddithin, the scholars have written different books, commenting that the different hadiths of the previous books of hadiths are forged, weakened, munkar, etc. Or he has mentioned it in the commentary of that book. But he did not dare to change the original book. But Nasiruddin Albani, a guru of the Muqallids in Ghair, was the first to start such an indecent act. He was the first to divide the various books of Sihah Sitta according to his own judgment and decision. Tirmizi has divided Sharif into two parts. The name of one part is Sahihut Tirmizi. Another part is named by Jafut Tirmizi. Thus Sahih Abu Dawood, in the name of Zayf Abu Dawood, Sahih Ibn Majah in the name of Zayf Ibn Majah, has behaved like the addition and subtraction of the book of Sihah Sittah. Which has not been done by any Muhaqqiq wise muhaddithin for hundreds of years.Simply put, if the previous book of hadith was added and subtracted for all, the original book could be lost at some point if the hadith was to be omitted from the book according to one's own ideology. Or may become irrational. So no previous muhaddith has done this. If it is fake or weak, it is mentioned in the commentary. But he did not remove it from the book. Can fake hadith be read? The answer to this question has already passed. It is haraam to consider a hadith which is agreed upon by the muhaddithin as a hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him) to be forged. It is haraam to propagate the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him). But it is permissible to read it to know or inform that it is a fake hadith. Such blasphemy is not permissible. But it is permissible to mention which one is Kufr. It is permissible to read a book to know if it is written. But it is not permissible to believe the word kufr in one's mind. Similarly, it is not permissible to read fake hadith as the hadith of the Prophet (peace be upon him). There is no problem in reading to know if it feels fake. 7165568158