fest Fatwa Cover

For a person who performs itikaf for ten days in the month of Ramadan, two Hajj and two Umrahs will be equivalent. ” 7219126574

Ahle Haq Bangla Media Servicefest


Question

Question A well-known Ahl al-Hadith has made the following statement about a hadith of Fazail Amal. Please present the correct Tahakeek in this regard. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: For a person who performs itikaaf for ten days in the month of Ramadaan, two Hajj and two 'Umrah will be equivalent. - The hadith is fake. . This is described by Bayhaqi in the book Ash-Shu'ab as Marfu from the hadith of Husain Ibn Ali (ra), - ‘The sanad is weak. Muhammad ibn Zayn Matruk '. Regarding him, Imam Bukhari said, "His hadith cannot be written." Ambasa Ibn Abdir Rahman is also in it. Regarding him, Imam Bukhari said, "The muhaddiths have abandoned him." Imam Zahabi has said in the book 'Az-Sho'afa', 'He is Matruf, he has been found guilty of forgery'. This is what has come in the book of Faizul Qadir. Regarding this ambasa, Abu Hatim said, "He used to fabricate hadith." As mentioned in Imam Zahabi's Al-Miyan. Then he mentioned some of his hadiths. This is one of them. According to him, Tabarani has described it in Al-Mu'jamul Kabir (1/292/1) and Abu Taher Al-Ambari in Al-Mashikhah (Kaf 162 / 1-2). Ibn Hibban (2/17) said, "He is the owner of many fabricated and baseless hadiths." This hadith is also found in Fazail Amal, Fazail Ramadan chapter, but with some more false narrations. Allama Sharani has copied the Ershad of Huzur in the book Kashful Gummah that the person who performs Itikaf for ten days in the month of Ramadan will get the reward of two Hajj and two Umrah. And whoever performs itikaf in the Jumu'ah Mosque from Maghrib to Esha and engages in prayers and recitation of the Qur'an without talking to anyone at that time, Allah Ta'ala will make a place for him in Paradise. (Fazail Amal Page-972 / Ramadan Page-7) Sheikh Zakaria did not narrate any sanad or usul of the hadith. Isn't this a conspiracy of Jamaat, which is running in the name of world invitation and preaching, to throw them in fake Hadith? May Allah bless us. 9382377349


Answer

- حامداومصلياومسلما، بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم -

Shaykh al-Hadith Allama Zakariya (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote on page 6 of Ramadan chapter 962 of his well-known collection of hadiths on the subject of Fazail Amal. Will get the reward of two umrahs. And whoever performs itikaf from Maghrib to Esha in the mosque where prayers are offered in congregation, and at that time he is engrossed in prayer and recitation of the Qur'an without talking to anyone, Allah will make a place for him in Paradise. (Fazail Amal-972 / Fazail Ramadan-6) This is the statement of Fazail Amal. So that the narration has been brought with the reference of Allama Sharani's book Kashful Gummah Kitab. Now let's look at Allama Sharani's book Kashful Gummah. Allama Sharani has mentioned the above two hadiths at the beginning of the Itikaf chapter of Kashful Gummah. Whose words are: Al-Hussein bin Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) was the Messenger of Allah, may Allah bless him and grant him peace This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Allah, the son of Qasra in Paradise. Nasiruddin Albani, one of the most controversial hadith scholars in the world, has said that this hadith is only a forgery. There is no difference of opinion between the scholars. It is permissible and mustahab to act in the case of giving encouragement and showing fear. When the hadith is not fake. (Al-Azkar-7-8) This principle is also stated by the following wise men-

  1. Mollah Ali Kari Rah-Mawjuate Kabir-5, Sharhun Nukaya-1/9
  2. Imam Hakeem Abu Abdullah Nishapuri Rah-Mustadrake Hakeem-1/490
  3. Allama Sakhabi Rah: - Al Qawlul Badi'-198
  4. Hafez Ibn Taymiyyah Hambli Rah: - Majmoo'ah Fatwa Ibn Taymiyyah / 1/39 Ahl al-Hadith
  5. Shaykhul Kul Mia Nazir Hussain Saheb Dehlabi Rah: Fatwa Naziria-1/265
  6. Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan- Dalilut Taleb Alal Matalib-69 (Nawab Siddique Hasan Khan Sahib is considered as one of the Aqabirs of Muqallids of Ghair.) )
  7. Maulana Sanaullah Omratasari Rah: - Akhbarul Hadith - 15 Shawwal 1348 AH.
  8. Hafez Muhammad Lakhvi Rah: Ahwalul Akhras-6
  9. Maulana Abdullah Rupari Sahib Rah: Fatwa Ahl-e-Hadith-2/463. At the same time, he is completely ignorant and ignorant about the vast sea of ​​Jarah Tadil of Keram in Muhaddisin. Nasiruddin Albani is a man whose reliance on tahkeek means blinding and running after another blind person. Shaykh Habibur Rahman Azmi (RA) wrote about him,And that is not Al-Albani, except that it is obligatory on the people to take the lead and imitate it as a whole, and not to rely on Ibn Taymiyyah and not on other than from the authenticity of the narrators, in the proofs of the investigation. That is to say, the main purpose of Nasiruddin Albani's statement is that people must make him Imam and imitate him blindly. And unless you ask Albani and accept his analysis, you will not rely on the hadiths of any other trustworthy and profound scholar, including Allama Ibn Taymiyyah. " Originally Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani has criticized the hadiths of most of the world famous muhaddiths. And in the case of this critique, he did not pay any attention to any of the principles of Hadith. He called all the hadiths which the great muhaddithin have called saheeh saheeh zayef, and what they called zayef saheeh, in order to establish his own opinion, he called them saheeh. Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani has said that a hadith is saheeh in one book and elsewhere it is called Zayef. The number of such hadiths is not one or two. In the case of numerous hadiths, he has resorted to such contradictions; Shaykh Habibur Rahman Azmi (may Allah be pleased with him) wrote about him: Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani is extremely reckless about misleading the world-renowned scholars who have the deepest knowledge. In this way he did not release anyone. You see! He made negative remarks about Imam Bukhari (R), Imam Muslim and other Imams. He has tried to mislead many others including the greatest scholar of the age Ibn Abdul Bar (R), Ibn Hazam (R), Imam Zahabi (R) Ibn Hazar Askalani (R), Imam Sanani (R). But many ignorant and ordinary scholars consider him a rare personality of the present age. ” The names of some of the scholars of the present world who have shed light on all these erroneous matters of Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani and have written a book about it are mentioned- Shaykh Habibur Rahman Azmi (Rah.). The name of the book written by him- الألباني شذوذه وأخطاؤه 2. Abdullah Al-Gumari, the famous muhaddith of North Africa. The title of his book is: Shaykh Abdul Aziz Gumari: Shaykh Muhammad bin Ahmad Al-Khazrazi Ustad Badruddin Hassan Diab Damascus - Abdullah Al-Harari, the famous muhaddith of Syria Shaykh Abdullah bin Baaz (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Shaykh Isma'il bin Muhammad Ansari (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Shaykh 'Abd al-Fattah Abu Guddah (may Allah be pleased with him) said: Shaykh Hasan bin Ali As-Saqqaf's Dictionary Shaykh Hasan bin Ali As-Saqqaf, “Al-Basharat wa al-Ithaaf fima bin Ibn Taymiyyah wa al-Albani fi al-Aqeedah min al-Ikhtalaf” We have mentioned here the names of a few books. Most of the great scholars of the age have written separate books on the erroneous issues of Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani. The author of "Sabatu Muallafatil Albani" has mentioned the names of 56 such books. Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani's misconceptions have been discussed in all these texts. Below are the names of some of the famous Salafi scholars who have discussed all these erroneous issues of Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani (RA). Shaykh Abdullah bin Baz (R). 2. Shaykh Hamood bin Abdullah (R). 3. Dr. Bakr bin Abdullah Abu Zaid. 4. Shaykh Abdullah bin Muhammad Ad-Dabish (R) 5. Safar bin Abdur Rahman. . Muhaddith Abdullah bin Abdur Rahman Sa'ad. . Shaykh Abdullah bin Maane Al-Utaybi. . Shaykh Fahad bin Abdullah As-Sunaid. 9. Abu Abdullah Mustafa Al-Adabi. Dr. Abdul Aziz Al-Askar Shaykh Nasiruddin Albani, the head of the Da'wah department of Jamaat-ul-Imam Muhammad bin Saud, has written about Al-Albani and his followers, But in reality they are not Salafis. The opinion of the Chief Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah bin Baz, regarding Nasir Uddin Albani (a) is a manifest error, which has not been preceded by a single one of the people of knowledge, and he is opposed to the authentic hadiths. Nasir Uddin Albani has made a blatant mistake which, as far as we know, no previous scholar has done. He further said that Mr. Albani is against the saheeh hadeeths. (Source: Salasu Rasa'il Fissalat: Ibn Baz 1/26) Sometimes he misinterprets saheeh hadeeth as weak, and sometimes he misrepresents weak hadeeth as saheeh. (Source: Darus Ibn Baz: 11/26, 2. Fatwa Ibn Baz: 25/71 in Majmoo'a) May Allah protect the Muslim Ummah from the misleading research of controversial researchers. Lutfur Rahman Faraji 1491292381

- والله اعلم باالصواب -

* This Fatwa was translated by Google Translate.
To see the original click here