Is there any fatwa in the book of Hanafi Fiqh which says that it is permissible to have intercourse with those who are not allowed to get married? 2832895353

It is not the work of the Ahl al-Hadith to spread confusion by copying half of the verses and creating smoke. The work of a deceiver. One of the sayings in the book of Hanafi jurisprudence in the above statement is, "If one marries and has sexual intercourse with someone who is forbidden to marry for life, then there is no Shari'ah limit on him." That's all. But the so-called Ahl al-Hadith brother! With his great knowledge, he has extended 3 more statements on his behalf. E.g.

1. It is permissible to marry forbidden girls for life.
2. It is permissible to have intercourse with forbidden girls for life.
3. No punishment will be imposed on them for this heinous act. The above three statements have nothing to do with Hanafi fiqh. These 3 words can be like the said Ahl al-Hadith itself. Hanafi is not fiqh. It is not written in any book of Hanafi fiqh that it is permissible to marry someone who is forbidden for life, or to have sexual intercourse, or that there is no punishment for this heinous act. On the contrary, the book of Hanafi fiqh clearly states that it is haraam to marry a girl who is forbidden for life. If a person thinks it is permissible to marry and have sexual intercourse, then that person is an apostate, it is obligatory to kill that person. Athar Imam Hanafi masalaka famous Hadith Book maanila sarahu Tahawi Rh has forged فلما لم يأمر النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم الرسول بالرجم, وإنما أمره بالقتل ثبت بذلك أن ذلك القتل ليس بحد للزنا, ولكنه لمعنى خلاف ذلك. وهو أن ذلك المتزوج, فعل ما فعل من ذلك على الاستحلال كما كانوا يفعلون في الجاهلية فصار بذلك مرتدا, فأمر رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أن يفعل به ما يفعل بالمرتد. وهكذا كان أبو حنيفة وسفيان رحمهما الله, يقولان في هذا المتزوج إذا كان أتى في ذلك على الاستحلال أنه يقتل. (شرح معانى الآثار, رقم الحديث -4885, -2 / 85) Hanafi fiqh and the famous book Fath al-Hidayah kadire clear famous quote famous byakhyagrantha It has been said that the person will not be given the Shariah limit, the opinion is not only of Imam Abu Hanifa, but also of Imam Sufyan Saori. And whoever commits such heinous act will have to be severely punished by the state. (قوله ومن تزوج امرأة لا يحل له نكاحها) بأن كانت من ذوي محارمه بنسب كأمه أو ابنته (فوطئها لم يجب عليه الحد عند أبي حنيفة) وسفيان الثوري وزفر, وإن قال: علمت أنها علي حرام ولكن يجب عليه بذلك المهر ويعاقب عقوبة هي أشد ما It is not possible for him to be punished, but there is no limit to what he can do. There is only so much in the book of Hanafi in Fiqh that there is no Shari'ah limit on that person. But the misleading Ahl al-Hadith person insisted 3 lies on his behalf. However, in the book of that Hanafi fiqh, it was said that the person was to be severely punished and he was killed as an apostate. Its name is deen propaganda or deception? We say that he will be killed as an apostate if he commits such heinous act. As if no one else could do such a thing in the future. But what do the people of Ahl al-Hadith want to do? Gina wants to give that heinous worker? In the case of Gina Had, if an unmarried person commits Gina, the provision is 100 lashes and release. (Surah Noor-2) Why are the so-called Ahlul-Hadeeth so interested in punishing such a despicable perpetrator without killing him as an apostate in proportion to Hanafi fiqh? So if any so-called Ahl al-Hadith commits such a heinous act, will he be released with 100 lashes? As if he could do such a horrible thing to someone else? Or is it safe to kill as an apostate in accordance with Hanafi fiqh, so that he may not do such a heinous act in the future, nor dare anyone else to do it? Which is justice? Do not say the extent of the work is a document to be permissible? If a person drinks alcohol, the legal limit of that person is 80 lashes. But if a person drinks urine, there is no specific limit for the Shari'ah, so the so-called Ahl al-Hadith will give a fatwa that it is permissible to drink urine ?! If it becomes permissible to say that there is no limit, then it will be permissible because there is no limit on drinking urine? There is no punishment for the worker? What kind of bizarre and hateful propaganda? Gina comes to the limit? If there is a god, then our question to Ahl al-Hadith has come to a Hadith: عن جابر بن عبد الله, قال: قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: «أيما مملول تزوج بغير إذن سيده, فهو عاهر» Narrated from Hazrat Jabir bin Abdullah. He said that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said that a slave who marries without the permission of his master is an adulterer. (Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadith No. 206, Musnad Ahmad, Hadith No. 14212, Sunan Darami, Hadith No. 2269, Sunan Tirmizi, Hadith No. 1111, Tahabi Sharif, Hadith No. 2605) Then the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) called that slave an adulterer. Now our question to the so-called Ahl al-Hadith brother, what is the extent of the adulterer marrying without the permission of the master? Answer in the light of Quran and Sahih Hadith? I want to know the Qur'an or Sahih Hadith, not logic or blind taqlid. The so-called Ahl al-Hadith brothers! Nowhere in fiqh Hanafi is it permissible to marry someone who is forbidden to marry for life. It is not permissible to have intercourse with them. At the same time, there is no mention that there is no punishment for this worker. But the pioneers of the so-called Ahl al-Hadith have passed all the heinous fatwas. Take a look - the so-called Ahl-e-Hadith Nawab Noor Hussain Sahib wrote: (Arful Jadi-113) Naujubillah! Not only that, the eminent Ahl-e-Hadith Maulana Sanaullah Umratasari has written: (Ahl al-Hadith in the newspaper, Ramadan number 138 AH, Mueenul Fiqh-95) If not this so-called Ahl al-Hadith? To whom is this heinous act permissible, and against whom is propaganda being spread? The same is said about Udor Pindi Budho's neck. May Allah protect the common Muslims from the plots of these deceitful Ahl al-Hadith. Amen. 1275941165