
In Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba, is there no mention of "below the navel" regarding the binding of hands in prayer? 8297917312
Ahle Haq Bangla Media Service•salat•
Question
I heard an Ahl al-Hadith brother say that the word "تحت السرة" is not part of the original book in the hadith of Wael Ibn Hujr narrated in Musannaf Ibn Abi Shayba. It has been extended to deceive people. 6549416449
Answer
- حامداومصلياومسلما، بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم -
In fact, most complaints are based on lack of knowledge. Ignorance and lack of education. A so-called Shaykh of Bangladesh has made this allegation in his false book titled "Salaat of Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam in the hands of fake hadiths". But if these brothers had studied a little more. He tried to reach a little deeper. They would not have faced this mistake if they had approached the sages without considering their own ignorance and stupidity as the final result. They would have freed themselves from the darkness of stupidity, and protected the Muslim Ummah from confusion. However, the fact is, there are 14/15 manuscripts of Musannaf Ibn Abi Shayba. Among them, in several manuscripts, the hadith is like this, with the word ةحة السرة (below the navel). Among them, the manuscripts of Imam Murtaza Azabidi and the manuscripts of Imam Abid Asindi are particularly noteworthy. The hadith is also in the manuscripts of Imam Qasim Ibn Qutlubuga, Allama Abdul Qadir Ibn Abu Bakr Assiddiqi and Allama Muhammad Akram Sindhi. It also has the word ةحة السرة (below the navel). On the other hand, some other manuscripts do not mention the word ةحة السرة (below the navel) in this description. This is why the old version of Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba printed in India did not have the part ةحة السرة (below the navel) in this hadith. The edition of the Musannaf that has reached the reader-researchers today in the Tahqiq-edition of the famous Faqih and Muhaddith Shaykh Muhammad Awama of Madinah Munawara includes the hadith with the section ةحة السرة (below the navel). Because the Shaykh had the first manuscripts in front of him. So he mentioned it. So to claim that this part is not originally in Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba is nothing more than ignorance of Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba. For details see- Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaiba, Tahqiq Shaykh Awama-3/321-322) 1427817856
- والله اعلم باالصواب -
* This Fatwa was translated by Google Translate.
To see the original click here
Related Fatwas
- Tahkeek of the hadith found in the light of light and the nonsense of the claimants of light 7124991651
- Is there no evidence for the four rak'at prayers of Kabbalah Jumu'ah? 3126297162
- Answers to some of the most common questions about madhhabs 5697116394
- Bukhari's account of the Prophet's attempted suicide 2857131816
- Ruling on praising the good deeds of non-Muslims and making dua in Arabic or Bengali in prostration 4578777317
- Musafaha how many hands with one hand or two hands 1434965929
- Regarding the janaza of the Prophet (peace be upon him) and the death of Hazrat Fatima (peace be upon him) 7154242933
- It is shirk to name the organization by any name other than Islam 9721947825