Is the fatwa of Marmer Ibn Uthaymeen correct when Iqamat begins? 6234844261

The above fatwa of Shaykh Usaimin is not correct. His statement is contrary to the verses of the Holy Quran. Because it is clear in the Qur'an - وَلَا تُبْطِلُوا أَعْمَالَكُمْ (٤٧:٣٣ Do not destroy your deeds. (Surah Muhammad-33) Allah Almighty has forbidden to destroy your deeds. And leaving the prayer without finishing one rakat means that the prayer is wasted. Because the minimum completion of prayer is to complete two rak'ats. So by breaking the prayer by reading one rak'at, it is doing the opposite of the Quranic verse. Therefore, it is not permissible to do it. Therefore, if Iqamat is standing, one must complete two rak'ats together with the remaining one rak'at. And in the hadith that It has been said that, "When a prayer is performed; then there is no prayer other than the obligatory prayer." This means that it is forbidden to intend to perform a new prayer after performing the Iqamat. Nothing has been said in the hadith. It has been said that there is no new prayer after the start of Iqamat. Therefore, the evidence given by this hadith for canceling the prayer that was being performed before the start of Iqamat is not correct. A question if the hadith is that there is no prayer when Iqamat begins. Based on the fact that no prayer can be offered, if the opinion of Marm is correct, then he gave a fatwa to break the prayer by praying one rakat, but why did he not give a fatwa to break the prayer and join the congregation while he was in the second rakat? What is the reason for this difference? He himself unknowingly accepted that when Iqamat begins, if there is any prayer, it should be broken, so he proved his fatwa wrong, didn't he? 7331941719